BLGR vs. CCOR

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

BLGR (Bluemonte Large Cap Growth ETF) and CCOR (Core Alternative ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. BLGR charges 0.24%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for CCOR.

Performance

BLGR vs. CCOR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bluemonte Large Cap Growth ETF (BLGR) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLGR achieves a 10.62% return, which is significantly higher than CCOR's -2.83% return.

BLGR

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 5.77%
• YTD: 10.62%
• 6M: 10.07%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CCOR

• 1D: 0.92%
• 1M: -1.39%
• YTD: -2.83%
• 6M: -4.10%
• 1Y: -5.09%
• 3Y*: -1.85%
• 5Y*: -2.38%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLGR vs. CCOR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BLGR Bluemonte Large Cap Growth ETF	10.62%	16.11%
CCOR Core Alternative ETF	-2.83%	-1.16%

Correlation

The correlation between BLGR and CCOR is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025	-0.08

BLGR vs. CCOR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BLGR	CCOR
Technology	48.1%	16.2%
Communication Services	15.8%	8.7%
Consumer Cyclical	10.7%	9.4%
Financial Services	8.2%	17.7%
Healthcare	6.7%	10.8%
Industrials	6.1%	9.2%
Consumer Defensive	1.8%	6.8%
Basic Materials	0.8%	5.1%
Real Estate	0.7%	2.8%
Energy	0.6%	7.2%
Utilities	0.6%	6.3%

Return for Risk

BLGR vs. CCOR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCOR

CCOR Risk / Return Rank: 3
CCOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
CCOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
CCOR Omega Ratio Rank: 3
CCOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
CCOR Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLGR vs. CCOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Large Cap Growth ETF (BLGR) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BLGR	CCOR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	-0.73	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.22	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.97	0.12	+1.84

Drawdowns

BLGR vs. CCOR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLGR drawdown since its inception was -14.08%, smaller than the maximum CCOR drawdown of -22.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLGR and CCOR.

Drawdown Indicators

	BLGR	CCOR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.08%	-22.99%	+8.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.75%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-12.31%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.99%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.13%	-19.29%	+18.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.43%	-7.29%	+4.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.80%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BLGR	CCOR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.05%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	5.05%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.38%	6.99%	+8.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.38%	11.10%	+4.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.38%	10.75%	+4.63%

BLGR vs. CCOR - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLGR has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than CCOR's 1.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

BLGR vs. CCOR - Dividend Comparison

BLGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, less than CCOR's 1.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BLGR Bluemonte Large Cap Growth ETF	0.23%	0.17%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CCOR Core Alternative ETF	1.10%	1.07%	1.18%	1.21%	1.11%	1.02%	1.50%	0.73%	1.53%	0.89%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BLGR and CCOR in my portfolio?

BLGR and CCOR have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BLGR or CCOR?

On fees, BLGR is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BLGR or CCOR?

BLGR is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for CCOR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BLGR or CCOR?

CCOR has the higher dividend yield at 1.10%, compared with 0.23% for BLGR.

What is the main difference between BLGR and CCOR?

They also come from different issuers: Bluemonte and Core Alternative Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for BLGR and 1.09% for CCOR.