BLES vs. RISN

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Inspire Global Hope ETF (BLES) and Inspire Tactical Balanced ESG ETF (RISN).

BLES and RISN are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BLES is a passively managed fund by Inspire that tracks the performance of the Inspire Global Hope Large Cap Equal Weight Index. It was launched on Feb 27, 2017. RISN is an actively managed fund by Inspire. It was launched on Jul 15, 2020.

Performance

BLES vs. RISN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Inspire Global Hope ETF (BLES) and Inspire Tactical Balanced ESG ETF (RISN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BLES vs. RISN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BLES Inspire Global Hope ETF	2.87%	19.25%	5.59%	16.47%	-16.21%	24.36%	23.18%
RISN Inspire Tactical Balanced ESG ETF	-0.95%	10.83%	7.61%	10.29%	-18.06%	22.47%	7.73%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLES achieves a 2.87% return, which is significantly higher than RISN's -0.95% return.

BLES

• 1D: 2.53%
• 1M: -5.71%
• YTD: 2.87%
• 6M: 5.21%
• 1Y: 20.00%
• 3Y*: 12.75%
• 5Y*: 7.36%
• 10Y*: —

RISN

• 1D: 1.83%
• 1M: -5.01%
• YTD: -0.95%
• 6M: -3.30%
• 1Y: 12.26%
• 3Y*: 9.71%
• 5Y*: 4.29%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLES vs. RISN - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLES has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than RISN's 0.82% expense ratio.

RISN

Inspire Tactical Balanced ESG ETF

BLES

Inspire Global Hope ETF

Return for Risk

BLES vs. RISN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLES

BLES Risk / Return Rank: 70
BLES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
BLES Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
BLES Omega Ratio Rank: 70
BLES Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
BLES Martin Ratio Rank: 75

RISN

RISN Risk / Return Rank: 48
RISN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
RISN Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
RISN Omega Ratio Rank: 40
RISN Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
RISN Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLES vs. RISN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire Global Hope ETF (BLES) and Inspire Tactical Balanced ESG ETF (RISN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BLES	RISN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.21	0.82	+0.39
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.77	1.24	+0.52
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.16	+0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.62	1.35	+0.27
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.76	5.35	+2.41
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BLES vs. RISN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BLES Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is higher than the RISN Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLES and RISN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BLES	RISN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.21	0.82	+0.39
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45	0.39	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.49	0.55	-0.05

Correlation

The correlation between BLES and RISN is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

BLES vs. RISN - Dividend Comparison

BLES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, more than RISN's 1.11% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BLES Inspire Global Hope ETF	1.93%	1.97%	1.90%	1.80%	1.64%	9.28%	1.61%	2.16%	1.73%	2.01%
RISN Inspire Tactical Balanced ESG ETF	1.11%	0.98%	1.39%	2.05%	1.27%	9.74%	4.71%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

BLES vs. RISN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLES drawdown since its inception was -40.35%, which is greater than RISN's maximum drawdown of -21.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLES and RISN.

Drawdown Indicators

	BLES	RISN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.35%	-21.88%	-18.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.26%	-9.28%	-2.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.61%	-21.88%	-4.73%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.84%	-5.73%	-0.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.14%	-7.67%	+1.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.57%	2.35%	+0.22%

Volatility

BLES vs. RISN - Volatility Comparison

Inspire Global Hope ETF (BLES) has a higher volatility of 5.73% compared to Inspire Tactical Balanced ESG ETF (RISN) at 4.23%. This indicates that BLES's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RISN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BLES	RISN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.73%	4.23%	+1.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.31%	9.32%	-0.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.59%	15.09%	+1.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.42%	11.14%	+5.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.03%	11.31%	+7.72%