BLBD vs. ALB
BLBD (Blue Bird Corporation) and ALB (Albemarle Corporation) are both stocks. BLBD operates in Auto Manufacturers (Consumer Cyclical), while ALB operates in Specialty Chemicals (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, BLBD returned 20.45%/yr vs 8.24%/yr for ALB. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BLBD vs. ALB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BLBD achieves a 57.43% return, which is significantly higher than ALB's 13.94% return. Over the past 10 years, BLBD has outperformed ALB with an annualized return of 20.45%, while ALB has yielded a comparatively lower 8.24% annualized return.
BLBD
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 13.31%
- YTD
- 57.43%
- 6M
- 43.06%
- 1Y
- 76.84%
- 3Y*
- 49.42%
- 5Y*
- 23.17%
- 10Y*
- 20.45%
ALB
- 1D
- -3.73%
- 1M
- -5.55%
- YTD
- 13.94%
- 6M
- 10.47%
- 1Y
- 173.60%
- 3Y*
- -9.72%
- 5Y*
- 1.50%
- 10Y*
- 8.24%
BLBD vs. ALB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLBD Blue Bird Corporation | 57.43% | 21.67% | 43.29% | 151.73% | -31.52% | -14.35% | -20.33% | 26.00% | -8.59% | 28.80% |
ALB Albemarle Corporation | 13.94% | 67.72% | -39.50% | -32.80% | -6.63% | 59.76% | 105.39% | -3.28% | -38.89% | 50.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between BLBD and ALB is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2014 | 0.31 |
The correlation between BLBD and ALB shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.33 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BLBD:
$2.41B
ALB:
$19.02B
BLBD:
$4.07
ALB:
-$2.33
BLBD:
1.62
ALB:
3.44
BLBD:
8.09
ALB:
2.50
BLBD:
$1.49B
ALB:
$5.49B
BLBD:
$314.22M
ALB:
$1.02B
BLBD:
$181.06M
ALB:
$801.97M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BLBD vs. ALB — Risk / Return Rank
BLBD
ALB
BLBD vs. ALB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blue Bird Corporation (BLBD) and Albemarle Corporation (ALB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BLBD | ALB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.37 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.29 | 5.51 | -2.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.42 | 16.11 | -8.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BLBD vs. ALB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BLBD drawdown since its inception was -74.16%, smaller than the maximum ALB drawdown of -83.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLBD and ALB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BLBD | ALB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.16% | -83.90% | +9.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.45% | -31.72% | +8.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.95% | -78.60% | +32.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.24% | -83.90% | +10.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -74.16% | -83.90% | +9.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -48.13% | +48.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.56% | -20.70% | +0.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.39% | 10.83% | -0.44% |
Volatility
BLBD vs. ALB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Blue Bird Corporation (BLBD) is 10.43%, while Albemarle Corporation (ALB) has a volatility of 15.31%. This indicates that BLBD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ALB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BLBD | ALB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.43% | 15.31% | -4.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.64% | 42.85% | -11.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.87% | 62.59% | -19.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 56.70% | 54.66% | +2.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.30% | 48.35% | +2.95% |
Dividends
BLBD vs. ALB - Dividend Comparison
BLBD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ALB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALB Albemarle Corporation | 1.01% | 1.15% | 1.87% | 1.11% | 0.73% | 0.67% | 1.04% | 2.01% | 1.74% | 1.00% | 1.42% | 2.07% |
BLBD Blue Bird Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
BLBD vs. ALB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Blue Bird Corporation and Albemarle Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BLBD vs. ALB - Profitability Comparison
BLBD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Blue Bird Corporation reported a gross profit of 70.65M and revenue of 352.64M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.0%.
ALB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Albemarle Corporation reported a gross profit of 500.97M and revenue of 1.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.1%.
BLBD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Blue Bird Corporation reported an operating income of 39.12M and revenue of 352.64M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.1%.
ALB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Albemarle Corporation reported an operating income of 233.51M and revenue of 1.43B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.3%.
BLBD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Blue Bird Corporation reported a net income of 29.30M and revenue of 352.64M, resulting in a net margin of 8.3%.
ALB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Albemarle Corporation reported a net income of 277.40M and revenue of 1.43B, resulting in a net margin of 19.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BLBD and ALB have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ALB has higher volatility (15.31%) compared to BLBD (10.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLBD dropped -74.16% vs ALB's -83.90%.
ALB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BLBD and ALB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer