PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKLC vs. OILK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BKLC vs. OILK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKLC achieves a 10.93% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 64.22% return.


BKLC

1D
-0.74%
1M
5.19%
YTD
10.93%
6M
10.81%
1Y
28.05%
3Y*
23.25%
5Y*
14.33%
10Y*

OILK

1D
1.40%
1M
-1.65%
YTD
64.22%
6M
60.70%
1Y
58.99%
3Y*
19.03%
5Y*
17.73%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKLC vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BKLC
BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF
10.93%18.06%25.56%30.88%-20.52%27.41%37.38%
OILK
ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF
64.22%-11.86%8.18%-0.97%27.57%63.71%-0.12%

Correlation

The correlation between BKLC and OILK is -0.29, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2020

0.13

The correlation between BKLC and OILK shifts across timeframes, from -0.29 (1 year) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BKLC vs. OILK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BKLC
OILK

Technology

38.0%

-

Financial Services

10.9%

-

Communication Services

10.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

9.8%
100.0%

Healthcare

8.3%

-

Industrials

7.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.4%

-

Energy

3.3%

-

Utilities

2.5%

-

Real Estate

1.7%

-

Basic Materials

1.6%

-

Technology

BKLC
38.0%
OILK

-

Financial Services

BKLC
10.9%
OILK

-

Communication Services

BKLC
10.8%
OILK

-

Consumer Cyclical

BKLC
9.8%
OILK
100.0%

Healthcare

BKLC
8.3%
OILK

-

Industrials

BKLC
7.8%
OILK

-

Consumer Defensive

BKLC
4.4%
OILK

-

Energy

BKLC
3.3%
OILK

-

Utilities

BKLC
2.5%
OILK

-

Real Estate

BKLC
1.7%
OILK

-

Basic Materials

BKLC
1.6%
OILK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BKLC vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKLC
BKLC Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
BKLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKLC Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
BKLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKLC Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

OILK
OILK Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
OILK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OILK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
OILK Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
OILK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
OILK Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKLC vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BKLCOILKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.34

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.10

3.42

-0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.15

6.91

+7.23

BKLC vs. OILK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKLC Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the OILK Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKLC and OILK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BKLCOILKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

2.06

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.59

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.12

0.12

+1.01

Drawdowns

BKLC vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKLC drawdown since its inception was -26.14%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKLC and OILK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BKLCOILKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.14%

-83.76%

+57.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.10%

-17.35%

+8.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.05%

-23.42%

+4.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.14%

-34.69%

+8.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.74%

-3.66%

+2.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.27%

-32.61%

+27.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

8.56%

-6.57%

Volatility

BKLC vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC) is 3.00%, while ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a volatility of 10.44%. This indicates that BKLC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BKLCOILKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.00%

10.44%

-7.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.12%

23.26%

-14.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.11%

28.75%

-16.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.16%

30.12%

-12.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.44%

35.97%

-18.53%

BKLC vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKLC has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

BKLC vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison

BKLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than OILK's 8.18% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BKLC
BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF
1.01%1.05%1.22%1.35%1.64%1.10%0.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%
OILK
ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF
8.18%4.79%3.11%5.80%17.32%68.82%0.13%0.94%0.58%6.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


BKLC and OILK have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OILK has higher volatility (10.44%) compared to BKLC (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKLC dropped -26.14% vs OILK's -83.76%.

On 5-year performance, OILK leads with 17.73% vs 14.33% for BKLC. On fees, BKLC is cheaper at 0.00% per year. On volatility, BKLC has been the lower-risk option at 3.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, OILK has performed better with a 17.73% return vs 14.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BKLC is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for OILK.

OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.18%, compared with 1.01% for BKLC.

BKLC is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while OILK is Oil & Gas. BKLC tracks Morningstar US Large Cap Index, while OILK tracks Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for BKLC and 0.68% for OILK.

BKLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BKLC and OILK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer