PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OILK vs. USO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OILK vs. USO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OILK achieves a 41.61% return, which is significantly lower than USO's 62.94% return.


OILK

1D
-1.44%
1M
-12.86%
YTD
41.61%
6M
40.08%
1Y
20.72%
3Y*
14.14%
5Y*
13.20%
10Y*

USO

1D
-1.90%
1M
-20.03%
YTD
62.94%
6M
61.61%
1Y
35.58%
3Y*
21.76%
5Y*
17.78%
10Y*
2.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OILK vs. USO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OILK
ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF
41.61%-11.86%8.18%-0.97%27.57%63.71%-61.09%30.48%-20.40%2.82%
USO
United States Oil Fund LP
62.94%-8.46%13.35%-4.94%28.97%64.68%-67.79%32.61%-19.57%2.47%

Correlation

The correlation between OILK and USO is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2016

0.98

The correlation between OILK and USO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OILK vs. USO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OILK
OILK Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
OILK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OILK Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
OILK Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
OILK Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
OILK Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

USO
USO Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
USO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
USO Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
USO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
USO Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OILK vs. USO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OILKUSODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.17

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.23

1.36

-0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.67

3.61

-0.94

OILK vs. USO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OILK Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is comparable to the USO Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OILK and USO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OILK vs. USO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OILK drawdown since its inception was -83.76%, smaller than the maximum USO drawdown of -98.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OILK and USO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OILKUSODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.76%

-98.19%

+14.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.92%

-26.33%

+9.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.42%

-26.33%

+2.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.69%

-36.23%

+1.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.92%

-88.01%

+71.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.48%

-75.31%

+42.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.89%

11.59%

-2.70%

Volatility

OILK vs. USO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) is 8.06%, while United States Oil Fund LP (USO) has a volatility of 11.79%. This indicates that OILK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OILKUSODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.06%

11.79%

-3.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.09%

39.34%

-15.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.05%

44.41%

-15.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.27%

36.32%

-6.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.97%

39.05%

-3.08%

OILK vs. USO - Expense Ratio Comparison

OILK has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than USO's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

OILK vs. USO - Dividend Comparison

OILK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.48%, while USO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
OILK
ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF
9.48%4.79%3.11%5.80%17.32%68.82%0.13%0.94%0.58%6.17%
USO
United States Oil Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, OILK and USO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

USO has higher volatility (11.79%) compared to OILK (8.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OILK dropped -83.76% vs USO's -98.19%.

On 5-year performance, USO leads with 17.78% vs 13.20% for OILK. On fees, OILK is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, OILK has been the lower-risk option at 8.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, USO has performed better with a 17.78% return vs 13.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

OILK is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for USO.

OILK has the higher dividend yield at 9.48%, compared with 0.00% for USO.

OILK tracks Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index, while USO tracks Front Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and USCF. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for OILK and 0.86% for USO.

USO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.81 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OILK and USO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer