PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKLC vs. BBUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BKLC vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with BKLC having a 10.93% return and BBUS slightly lower at 10.60%.


BKLC

1D
-0.74%
1M
5.19%
YTD
10.93%
6M
10.81%
1Y
28.05%
3Y*
23.25%
5Y*
14.33%
10Y*

BBUS

1D
-0.74%
1M
5.12%
YTD
10.60%
6M
10.47%
1Y
27.47%
3Y*
22.46%
5Y*
13.43%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKLC vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BKLC
BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF
10.93%18.06%25.56%30.88%-20.52%27.41%37.38%
BBUS
JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF
10.60%17.77%24.89%27.20%-19.46%27.13%38.93%

Correlation

The correlation between BKLC and BBUS is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2020

0.98

The correlation between BKLC and BBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

BKLC vs. BBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BKLC
BBUS

Technology

38.0%
37.1%

Financial Services

10.9%
10.8%

Communication Services

10.8%
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

9.8%
9.4%

Healthcare

8.3%
8.1%

Industrials

7.8%
7.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
4.5%

Energy

3.3%
3.2%

Utilities

2.5%
2.6%

Real Estate

1.7%
1.7%

Basic Materials

1.6%
1.2%

Technology

BKLC
38.0%
BBUS
37.1%

Financial Services

BKLC
10.9%
BBUS
10.8%

Communication Services

BKLC
10.8%
BBUS
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

BKLC
9.8%
BBUS
9.4%

Healthcare

BKLC
8.3%
BBUS
8.1%

Industrials

BKLC
7.8%
BBUS
7.2%

Consumer Defensive

BKLC
4.4%
BBUS
4.5%

Energy

BKLC
3.3%
BBUS
3.2%

Utilities

BKLC
2.5%
BBUS
2.6%

Real Estate

BKLC
1.7%
BBUS
1.7%

Basic Materials

BKLC
1.6%
BBUS
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BKLC vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKLC
BKLC Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
BKLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKLC Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
BKLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKLC Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

BBUS
BBUS Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
BBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
BBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKLC vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BKLCBBUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.42

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.10

3.00

+0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.15

13.76

+0.39

BKLC vs. BBUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKLC Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the BBUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKLC and BBUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BKLCBBUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

2.33

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.79

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.12

0.84

+0.29

Drawdowns

BKLC vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKLC drawdown since its inception was -26.14%, smaller than the maximum BBUS drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKLC and BBUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BKLCBBUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.14%

-35.35%

+9.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.10%

-9.21%

+0.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.05%

-19.01%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.14%

-25.46%

-0.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.74%

-0.74%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.27%

-5.46%

+0.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

2.00%

-0.01%

Volatility

BKLC vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison

BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) have volatilities of 3.00% and 2.88%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BKLCBBUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.00%

2.88%

+0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.12%

8.96%

+0.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.11%

11.87%

+0.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.16%

17.03%

+0.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.44%

19.59%

-2.15%

BKLC vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKLC has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BKLC vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison

BKLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, more than BBUS's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BBUS
JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF
0.98%1.07%1.21%1.38%1.57%1.11%1.43%1.37%
BKLC
BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF
1.01%1.05%1.22%1.35%1.64%1.10%0.84%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, BKLC and BBUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BKLC has higher volatility (3.00%) compared to BBUS (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKLC dropped -26.14% vs BBUS's -35.35%.

On 5-year performance, BKLC leads with 14.33% vs 13.43% for BBUS. On fees, BKLC is cheaper at 0.00% per year. On volatility, BBUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BKLC has performed better with a 14.33% return vs 13.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BKLC is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.02% for BBUS.

BKLC has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.98% for BBUS.

BKLC tracks Morningstar US Large Cap Index, while BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for BKLC and 0.02% for BBUS.

BKLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BKLC and BBUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer