PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKLC vs. ABAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BKLC vs. ABAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC) and American Battery Technology Company Common Stock (ABAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKLC achieves a 10.93% return, which is significantly higher than ABAT's 8.38% return.


BKLC

1D
-0.74%
1M
5.19%
YTD
10.93%
6M
10.81%
1Y
28.05%
3Y*
23.25%
5Y*
14.33%
10Y*

ABAT

1D
-8.12%
1M
12.42%
YTD
8.38%
6M
-3.47%
1Y
144.59%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKLC vs. ABAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BKLC
BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF
10.93%18.06%25.56%11.47%
ABAT
American Battery Technology Company Common Stock
8.38%35.77%-47.55%-57.94%

Correlation

The correlation between BKLC and ABAT is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2023

0.30

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BKLC vs. ABAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKLC
BKLC Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
BKLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKLC Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
BKLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKLC Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

ABAT
ABAT Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
ABAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABAT Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
ABAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABAT Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKLC vs. ABAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC) and American Battery Technology Company Common Stock (ABAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BKLCABATDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.27

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.10

1.87

+1.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.15

2.69

+11.46

BKLC vs. ABAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKLC Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is higher than the ABAT Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKLC and ABAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BKLCABATDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

1.14

+1.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.12

-0.28

+1.41

Drawdowns

BKLC vs. ABAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKLC drawdown since its inception was -26.14%, smaller than the maximum ABAT drawdown of -93.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKLC and ABAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BKLCABATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.14%

-93.18%

+67.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.10%

-77.85%

+68.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.74%

-68.05%

+67.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.27%

-76.66%

+71.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

54.04%

-52.05%

Volatility

BKLC vs. ABAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC) is 3.00%, while American Battery Technology Company Common Stock (ABAT) has a volatility of 28.19%. This indicates that BKLC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ABAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BKLCABATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.00%

28.19%

-25.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.12%

64.77%

-55.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.11%

127.62%

-115.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.16%

121.55%

-104.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.44%

121.55%

-104.11%

Dividends

BKLC vs. ABAT - Dividend Comparison

BKLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, while ABAT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
ABAT
American Battery Technology Company Common Stock
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BKLC
BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF
1.01%1.05%1.22%1.35%1.64%1.10%0.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


BKLC and ABAT have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ABAT has higher volatility (28.19%) compared to BKLC (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKLC dropped -26.14% vs ABAT's -93.18%.

BKLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BKLC and ABAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer