ABAT vs. CRML

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ABAT (American Battery Technology Company Common Stock) and CRML (Critical Metals Corp) are both stocks. Both operate in the Other Industrial Metals & Mining industry within the Basic Materials sector. Over the past year, ABAT returned 144.59% vs 680.85% for CRML. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ABAT vs. CRML - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Battery Technology Company Common Stock (ABAT) and Critical Metals Corp (CRML). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABAT achieves a 8.38% return, which is significantly lower than CRML's 58.65% return.

ABAT

• 1D: -8.12%
• 1M: 12.42%
• YTD: 8.38%
• 6M: -3.47%
• 1Y: 144.59%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CRML

• 1D: -8.33%
• 1M: -14.72%
• YTD: 58.65%
• 6M: 32.97%
• 1Y: 680.85%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABAT vs. CRML - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ABAT American Battery Technology Company Common Stock	8.38%	35.77%	12.33%
CRML Critical Metals Corp	58.65%	2.21%	-69.82%

Correlation

The correlation between ABAT and CRML is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2024	0.36

The correlation between ABAT and CRML shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (all time) to 0.55 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS ABAT : -$0.55 CRML : -$0.53
PS Ratio ABAT : 25.84 CRML : 1.91K
Total Revenue (TTM) ABAT : $16.28M CRML : $560.62K
Gross Profit (TTM) ABAT : -$6.95M CRML : $560.62K
EBITDA (TTM) ABAT : -$62.40M CRML : -$47.47M

Return for Risk

ABAT vs. CRML — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABAT

ABAT Risk / Return Rank: 73
ABAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
ABAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
ABAT Omega Ratio Rank: 75
ABAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
ABAT Martin Ratio Rank: 64

CRML

CRML Risk / Return Rank: 94
CRML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
CRML Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
CRML Omega Ratio Rank: 90
CRML Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
CRML Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABAT vs. CRML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Battery Technology Company Common Stock (ABAT) and Critical Metals Corp (CRML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ABAT	CRML	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.14	3.92	-2.78
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.20	3.97	-1.76
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.44	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.87	8.84	-6.97
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.69	13.34	-10.65
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ABAT vs. CRML - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABAT Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is lower than the CRML Sharpe Ratio of 3.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABAT and CRML, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ABAT	CRML	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.14	3.92	-2.78
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.28	-0.17	-0.11

Drawdowns

ABAT vs. CRML - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABAT drawdown since its inception was -93.18%, roughly equal to the maximum CRML drawdown of -93.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABAT and CRML.

Drawdown Indicators

	ABAT	CRML	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.18%	-93.91%	+0.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-77.85%	-77.74%	-0.11%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-68.05%	-63.26%	-4.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-76.66%	-68.24%	-8.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	54.04%	51.41%	+2.63%

Volatility

ABAT vs. CRML - Volatility Comparison

American Battery Technology Company Common Stock (ABAT) has a higher volatility of 28.19% compared to Critical Metals Corp (CRML) at 23.49%. This indicates that ABAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ABAT	CRML	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	28.19%	23.49%	+4.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	64.77%	102.17%	-37.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	127.62%	175.33%	-47.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	121.55%	157.31%	-35.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	121.55%	157.31%	-35.76%

Dividends

ABAT vs. CRML - Dividend Comparison

Neither ABAT nor CRML has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ABAT and CRML in my portfolio?

ABAT and CRML have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ABAT or CRML?

ABAT has higher volatility (28.19%) compared to CRML (23.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABAT dropped -93.18% vs CRML's -93.91%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CRML currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.92 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.