ABAT vs. CRML
ABAT (American Battery Technology Company Common Stock) and CRML (Critical Metals Corp) are both stocks. Both operate in the Other Industrial Metals & Mining industry within the Basic Materials sector. Over the past year, ABAT returned 130.89% vs 301.24% for CRML. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ABAT vs. CRML - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ABAT achieves a -14.97% return, which is significantly lower than CRML's 39.91% return.
ABAT
- 1D
- -3.07%
- 1M
- -12.07%
- YTD
- -14.97%
- 6M
- -30.56%
- 1Y
- 130.89%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRML
- 1D
- -7.08%
- 1M
- -11.57%
- YTD
- 39.91%
- 6M
- 20.32%
- 1Y
- 301.24%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ABAT vs. CRML - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ABAT American Battery Technology Company Common Stock | -14.97% | 35.77% | 9.82% |
CRML Critical Metals Corp | 39.91% | 2.21% | -24.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between ABAT and CRML is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2024 | 0.36 |
Over the past year, ABAT and CRML have become more correlated (0.59) than their long-term average of 0.36, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
ABAT:
-$0.55
CRML:
-$0.53
ABAT:
20.27
CRML:
1.69K
ABAT:
$16.28M
CRML:
$560.62K
ABAT:
-$6.95M
CRML:
$560.62K
ABAT:
-$62.40M
CRML:
-$47.47M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ABAT vs. CRML — Risk / Return Rank
ABAT
CRML
ABAT vs. CRML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Battery Technology Company Common Stock (ABAT) and Critical Metals Corp (CRML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ABAT | CRML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.34 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.69 | 3.90 | -2.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.33 | 5.66 | -3.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ABAT vs. CRML - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABAT drawdown since its inception was -93.56%, roughly equal to the maximum CRML drawdown of -93.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABAT and CRML.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ABAT | CRML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.56% | -93.91% | +0.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -77.85% | -77.74% | -0.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -75.93% | -67.60% | -8.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -77.62% | -68.09% | -9.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 56.35% | 53.53% | +2.82% |
Volatility
ABAT vs. CRML - Volatility Comparison
American Battery Technology Company Common Stock (ABAT) has a higher volatility of 40.14% compared to Critical Metals Corp (CRML) at 26.30%. This indicates that ABAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ABAT | CRML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 40.14% | 26.30% | +13.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 70.87% | 100.03% | -29.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 131.96% | 165.19% | -33.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 122.25% | 184.41% | -62.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 122.25% | 184.41% | -62.16% |
Dividends
ABAT vs. CRML - Dividend Comparison
Neither ABAT nor CRML has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
ABAT vs. CRML - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between American Battery Technology Company Common Stock and Critical Metals Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
ABAT and CRML have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ABAT has higher volatility (40.14%) compared to CRML (26.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABAT dropped -93.56% vs CRML's -93.91%.
CRML currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ABAT and CRML
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer