PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKIE vs. SCHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BKIE vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKIE achieves a 7.27% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 3.75% return.


BKIE

1D
0.63%
1M
-0.95%
YTD
7.27%
6M
9.96%
1Y
20.75%
3Y*
16.78%
5Y*
8.82%
10Y*

SCHG

1D
0.15%
1M
-0.94%
YTD
3.75%
6M
2.93%
1Y
20.82%
3Y*
24.03%
5Y*
14.90%
10Y*
18.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKIE vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BKIE
BNY Mellon International Equity ETF
7.27%32.08%4.63%18.25%-13.60%13.75%34.17%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
3.75%17.50%34.95%50.10%-31.80%28.11%47.58%

Correlation

The correlation between BKIE and SCHG is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2020

0.65

The correlation between BKIE and SCHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

BKIE vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BKIE
SCHG

Financial Services

25.8%
6.7%

Industrials

18.6%
5.8%

Technology

10.1%
46.3%

Healthcare

9.1%
7.7%

Consumer Cyclical

7.3%
12.7%

Basic Materials

7.2%
1.4%

Consumer Defensive

6.2%
1.7%

Energy

5.9%
0.8%

Communication Services

4.2%
16.0%

Utilities

3.7%
0.4%

Real Estate

2.0%
0.5%

Financial Services

BKIE
25.8%
SCHG
6.7%

Industrials

BKIE
18.6%
SCHG
5.8%

Technology

BKIE
10.1%
SCHG
46.3%

Healthcare

BKIE
9.1%
SCHG
7.7%

Consumer Cyclical

BKIE
7.3%
SCHG
12.7%

Basic Materials

BKIE
7.2%
SCHG
1.4%

Consumer Defensive

BKIE
6.2%
SCHG
1.7%

Energy

BKIE
5.9%
SCHG
0.8%

Communication Services

BKIE
4.2%
SCHG
16.0%

Utilities

BKIE
3.7%
SCHG
0.4%

Real Estate

BKIE
2.0%
SCHG
0.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BKIE vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKIE
BKIE Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
BKIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKIE Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
BKIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKIE Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKIE vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BKIESCHGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.24

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

1.27

+0.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.03

4.25

+2.78

BKIE vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKIE Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is comparable to the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKIE and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BKIESCHGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.41

1.33

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.67

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

0.83

+0.07

Drawdowns

BKIE vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKIE drawdown since its inception was -28.19%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKIE and SCHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BKIESCHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.19%

-34.59%

+6.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.41%

-16.41%

+5.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.19%

-23.39%

+10.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.19%

-34.59%

+6.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.41%

-4.25%

+1.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.97%

-5.20%

+0.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.96%

4.91%

-1.95%

Volatility

BKIE vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE) is 4.17%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 4.52%. This indicates that BKIE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BKIESCHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.17%

4.52%

-0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.46%

12.02%

+0.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.84%

15.77%

-0.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.16%

22.31%

-6.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.36%

21.58%

-5.22%

BKIE vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BKIE and SCHG have an expense ratio of 0.04%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BKIE vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

BKIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.30%, more than SCHG's 0.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BKIE
BNY Mellon International Equity ETF
3.30%3.12%3.31%2.88%2.97%2.58%1.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.37%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


BKIE and SCHG have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHG has higher volatility (4.52%) compared to BKIE (4.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKIE dropped -28.19% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

On 5-year performance, SCHG leads with 14.90% vs 8.82% for BKIE. Both ETFs have the same 0.04% expense ratio. On volatility, BKIE has been the lower-risk option at 4.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 14.90% return vs 8.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BKIE and SCHG have the same expense ratio: 0.04% per year.

BKIE has the higher dividend yield at 3.30%, compared with 0.37% for SCHG.

BKIE is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. BKIE tracks Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Large Cap Index, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and Charles Schwab.

BKIE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BKIE and SCHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer