BKCI vs. EFAS

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

BKCI (BNY Mellon Concentrated International ETF) and EFAS (Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BKCI is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by BNY Mellon, while EFAS is a Dividend fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Top 50 Dividend Index. BKCI is actively managed, while EFAS is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BKCI returned 3.92%/yr vs 23.73%/yr for EFAS. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BKCI charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for EFAS.

Performance

BKCI vs. EFAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Concentrated International ETF (BKCI) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKCI achieves a 3.15% return, which is significantly lower than EFAS's 15.86% return.

BKCI

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: -0.41%
• 6M: 0.37%
• YTD: 3.15%
• 1Y: 5.09%
• 3Y*: 3.92%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EFAS

• 1D: 0.94%
• 1M: 0.35%
• 6M: 14.68%
• YTD: 15.86%
• 1Y: 27.92%
• 3Y*: 23.73%
• 5Y*: 13.40%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKCI vs. EFAS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BKCI BNY Mellon Concentrated International ETF	3.15%	9.94%	-2.44%	20.27%	-20.26%	0.38%
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF	15.86%	46.83%	3.07%	14.65%	-8.00%	2.79%

Correlation

The correlation between BKCI and EFAS is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2021	0.67

The correlation between BKCI and EFAS shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.67 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BKCI vs. EFAS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BKCI	EFAS
Technology	24.8%	0.1%
Healthcare	20.4%	0.1%
Consumer Cyclical	14.1%	1.9%
Basic Materials	11.6%	1.7%
Industrials	9.9%	10.4%
Financial Services	5.2%	31.0%
Energy	5.0%	13.1%
Consumer Defensive	3.6%	8.1%
Real Estate	3.0%	11.4%
Communication Services	2.5%	8.6%
Utilities	-	13.7%

Return for Risk

BKCI vs. EFAS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKCI

BKCI Risk / Return Rank: 15
BKCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
BKCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
BKCI Omega Ratio Rank: 14
BKCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
BKCI Martin Ratio Rank: 18

EFAS

EFAS Risk / Return Rank: 90
EFAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
EFAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
EFAS Omega Ratio Rank: 90
EFAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
EFAS Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKCI vs. EFAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Concentrated International ETF (BKCI) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BKCI	EFAS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.35	2.56	-2.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.59	3.60	-3.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.45	-0.38
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.45	5.29	-4.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.42	12.93	-11.51

BKCI vs. EFAS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKCI Sharpe Ratio is 0.35, which is lower than the EFAS Sharpe Ratio of 2.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKCI and EFAS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BKCI vs. EFAS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKCI drawdown since its inception was -31.03%, smaller than the maximum EFAS drawdown of -44.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKCI and EFAS.

Drawdown Indicators

	BKCI	EFAS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.03%	-44.38%	+13.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.30%	-5.30%	-6.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.02%	-11.84%	-8.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-28.81%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.00%	-0.52%	-1.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.21%	-7.02%	-2.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.59%	2.17%	+1.42%

Volatility

BKCI vs. EFAS - Volatility Comparison

BNY Mellon Concentrated International ETF (BKCI) has a higher volatility of 3.31% compared to Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS) at 2.76%. This indicates that BKCI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BKCI	EFAS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.31%	2.76%	+0.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.77%	8.74%	+3.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.50%	10.95%	+3.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.56%	15.57%	+0.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.56%	18.27%	-1.71%

BKCI vs. EFAS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKCI has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than EFAS's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

BKCI vs. EFAS - Dividend Comparison

BKCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, less than EFAS's 4.71% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BKCI BNY Mellon Concentrated International ETF	1.35%	1.39%	0.78%	0.73%	0.46%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF	4.71%	4.83%	6.76%	6.33%	7.28%	5.19%	4.34%	5.75%	6.63%	6.15%	0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BKCI and EFAS in my portfolio?

BKCI and EFAS have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BKCI or EFAS?

BKCI has higher volatility (3.31%) compared to EFAS (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKCI dropped -31.03% vs EFAS's -44.38%.

Which ETF is better, BKCI or EFAS?

On 3-year performance, EFAS leads with 23.73% vs 3.92% for BKCI. On fees, EFAS is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, EFAS has been the lower-risk option at 2.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BKCI or EFAS?

Over the 3-year period, EFAS has performed better with a 23.73% return vs 3.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BKCI or EFAS?

EFAS is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BKCI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BKCI or EFAS?

EFAS has the higher dividend yield at 4.71%, compared with 1.35% for BKCI.

What is the main difference between BKCI and EFAS?

BKCI is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while EFAS is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for BKCI and 0.55% for EFAS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EFAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.