BKCI vs. BCPL

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

BKCI (BNY Mellon Concentrated International ETF) and BCPL (BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BKCI is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by BNY Mellon, while BCPL is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by BNY Mellon. Both are actively managed. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BKCI charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for BCPL.

Performance

BKCI vs. BCPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Concentrated International ETF (BKCI) and BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF (BCPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BKCI

• 1D: -1.11%
• 1M: 0.05%
• YTD: 2.60%
• 6M: 2.54%
• 1Y: 7.68%
• 3Y*: 4.75%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BCPL

• 1D: -0.32%
• 1M: 0.75%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKCI vs. BCPL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BKCI BNY Mellon Concentrated International ETF	-0.69%
BCPL BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF	0.51%

Correlation

The correlation between BKCI and BCPL is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2026	0.61

Return for Risk

BKCI vs. BCPL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKCI

BKCI Risk / Return Rank: 17
BKCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
BKCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
BKCI Omega Ratio Rank: 15
BKCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
BKCI Martin Ratio Rank: 19

BCPL

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKCI vs. BCPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Concentrated International ETF (BKCI) and BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF (BCPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BKCI	BCPL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.53	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.83	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.68	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.15	—	—

Drawdowns

BKCI vs. BCPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKCI drawdown since its inception was -31.03%, which is greater than BCPL's maximum drawdown of -2.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKCI and BCPL.

Drawdown Indicators

	BKCI	BCPL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.03%	-2.95%	-28.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.30%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.02%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.95%	-1.04%	-0.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.31%	-1.04%	-8.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.58%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BKCI	BCPL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.26%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.72%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.59%	4.04%	+10.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.62%	4.04%	+12.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.62%	4.04%	+12.58%

BKCI vs. BCPL - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKCI has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than BCPL's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

BKCI vs. BCPL - Dividend Comparison

BKCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, less than BCPL's 1.56% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BCPL BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF	1.56%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
BKCI BNY Mellon Concentrated International ETF	1.35%	1.39%	0.78%	0.73%	0.46%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BKCI and BCPL in my portfolio?

BKCI and BCPL have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BKCI or BCPL?

On fees, BCPL is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BKCI or BCPL?

BCPL is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BKCI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BKCI or BCPL?

BCPL has the higher dividend yield at 1.56%, compared with 1.35% for BKCI.

What is the main difference between BKCI and BCPL?

BKCI is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while BCPL is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for BKCI and 0.40% for BCPL.