PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKCI vs. BKLC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BKCI vs. BKLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Concentrated International ETF (BKCI) and BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKCI achieves a 3.52% return, which is significantly lower than BKLC's 10.93% return.


BKCI

1D
-0.32%
1M
3.93%
YTD
3.52%
6M
4.73%
1Y
6.77%
3Y*
4.55%
5Y*
10Y*

BKLC

1D
-0.74%
1M
5.19%
YTD
10.93%
6M
10.81%
1Y
28.05%
3Y*
23.25%
5Y*
14.33%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKCI vs. BKLC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BKCI
BNY Mellon Concentrated International ETF
3.52%9.94%-2.44%20.27%-20.26%0.38%
BKLC
BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF
10.93%18.06%25.56%30.88%-20.52%1.29%

Correlation

The correlation between BKCI and BKLC is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2021

0.76

The correlation between BKCI and BKLC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

BKCI vs. BKLC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BKCI
BKLC

Technology

23.5%
38.0%

Healthcare

19.3%
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

13.9%
9.8%

Industrials

11.7%
7.8%

Basic Materials

11.7%
1.6%

Energy

5.5%
3.3%

Financial Services

5.5%
10.9%

Consumer Defensive

3.5%
4.4%

Real Estate

3.1%
1.7%

Communication Services

2.4%
10.8%

Utilities

-

2.5%

Technology

BKCI
23.5%
BKLC
38.0%

Healthcare

BKCI
19.3%
BKLC
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

BKCI
13.9%
BKLC
9.8%

Industrials

BKCI
11.7%
BKLC
7.8%

Basic Materials

BKCI
11.7%
BKLC
1.6%

Energy

BKCI
5.5%
BKLC
3.3%

Financial Services

BKCI
5.5%
BKLC
10.9%

Consumer Defensive

BKCI
3.5%
BKLC
4.4%

Real Estate

BKCI
3.1%
BKLC
1.7%

Communication Services

BKCI
2.4%
BKLC
10.8%

Utilities

BKCI

-

BKLC
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BKCI vs. BKLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKCI
BKCI Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
BKCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKCI Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
BKCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKCI Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

BKLC
BKLC Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
BKLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKLC Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
BKLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKLC Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKCI vs. BKLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Concentrated International ETF (BKCI) and BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BKCIBKLCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.42

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.60

3.10

-2.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.89

14.15

-12.26

BKCI vs. BKLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKCI Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is lower than the BKLC Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKCI and BKLC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BKCIBKLCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

2.33

-1.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

1.12

-1.03

Drawdowns

BKCI vs. BKLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKCI drawdown since its inception was -31.03%, which is greater than BKLC's maximum drawdown of -26.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKCI and BKLC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BKCIBKLCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.03%

-26.14%

-4.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.30%

-9.10%

-2.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.02%

-19.05%

-0.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.06%

-0.74%

-0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.40%

-5.27%

-4.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.60%

1.99%

+1.61%

Volatility

BKCI vs. BKLC - Volatility Comparison

BNY Mellon Concentrated International ETF (BKCI) has a higher volatility of 3.62% compared to BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC) at 3.00%. This indicates that BKCI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BKCIBKLCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.62%

3.00%

+0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.24%

9.12%

+2.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.30%

12.11%

+2.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.61%

17.16%

-0.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.61%

17.44%

-0.83%

BKCI vs. BKLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKCI has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than BKLC's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

BKCI vs. BKLC - Dividend Comparison

BKCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, more than BKLC's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
BKCI
BNY Mellon Concentrated International ETF
1.34%1.39%0.78%0.73%0.46%0.00%0.00%
BKLC
BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF
1.01%1.05%1.22%1.35%1.64%1.10%0.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


BKCI and BKLC have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BKCI has higher volatility (3.62%) compared to BKLC (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKCI dropped -31.03% vs BKLC's -26.14%.

On 3-year performance, BKLC leads with 23.25% vs 4.55% for BKCI. On fees, BKLC is cheaper at 0.00% per year. On volatility, BKLC has been the lower-risk option at 3.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, BKLC has performed better with a 23.25% return vs 4.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BKLC is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BKCI.

BKCI has the higher dividend yield at 1.34%, compared with 1.01% for BKLC.

BKCI is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while BKLC is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for BKCI and 0.00% for BKLC.

BKLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BKCI and BKLC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer