BKAG vs. BKLC
BKAG (BNY Mellon Core Bond ETF) and BKLC (BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BKAG is a Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg US Aggregate Total Return Index, while BKLC is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Large Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BKAG returned 0.07%/yr vs 14.33%/yr for BKLC. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.00% expense ratio.
Performance
BKAG vs. BKLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BKAG achieves a 0.29% return, which is significantly lower than BKLC's 10.93% return.
BKAG
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 0.29%
- 6M
- 0.12%
- 1Y
- 5.10%
- 3Y*
- 3.95%
- 5Y*
- 0.07%
- 10Y*
- —
BKLC
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 5.19%
- YTD
- 10.93%
- 6M
- 10.81%
- 1Y
- 28.05%
- 3Y*
- 23.25%
- 5Y*
- 14.33%
- 10Y*
- —
BKAG vs. BKLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKAG BNY Mellon Core Bond ETF | 0.29% | 7.23% | 1.17% | 5.67% | -13.29% | -1.46% | 2.15% |
BKLC BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF | 10.93% | 18.06% | 25.56% | 30.88% | -20.52% | 27.41% | 36.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between BKAG and BKLC is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2020 | 0.14 |
The correlation between BKAG and BKLC shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (all time) to 0.28 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BKAG vs. BKLC — Risk / Return Rank
BKAG
BKLC
BKAG vs. BKLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Core Bond ETF (BKAG) and BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BKAG | BKLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.42 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.86 | 3.10 | -1.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.49 | 14.15 | -8.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BKAG | BKLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.32 | 2.33 | -1.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 | 0.84 | -0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.01 | 1.12 | -1.11 |
Drawdowns
BKAG vs. BKLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BKAG drawdown since its inception was -18.53%, smaller than the maximum BKLC drawdown of -26.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKAG and BKLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BKAG | BKLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.53% | -26.14% | +7.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.76% | -9.10% | +6.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.04% | -19.05% | +13.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.00% | -26.14% | +8.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.32% | -0.74% | -1.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.12% | -5.27% | -1.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.93% | 1.99% | -1.06% |
Volatility
BKAG vs. BKLC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BNY Mellon Core Bond ETF (BKAG) is 1.22%, while BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC) has a volatility of 3.00%. This indicates that BKAG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BKLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BKAG | BKLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.22% | 3.00% | -1.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.74% | 9.12% | -6.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.87% | 12.11% | -8.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.01% | 17.16% | -11.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.55% | 17.44% | -11.89% |
BKAG vs. BKLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
BKAG has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than BKLC's 0.00% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BKAG vs. BKLC - Dividend Comparison
BKAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%, more than BKLC's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKAG BNY Mellon Core Bond ETF | 4.24% | 4.17% | 4.26% | 3.33% | 2.49% | 1.55% | 1.16% |
BKLC BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF | 1.01% | 1.05% | 1.22% | 1.35% | 1.64% | 1.10% | 0.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BKAG and BKLC have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BKLC has higher volatility (3.00%) compared to BKAG (1.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKAG dropped -18.53% vs BKLC's -26.14%.
On 5-year performance, BKLC leads with 14.33% vs 0.07% for BKAG. Both ETFs have the same 0.00% expense ratio. On volatility, BKAG has been the lower-risk option at 1.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BKLC has performed better with a 14.33% return vs 0.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BKAG and BKLC have the same expense ratio: 0.00% per year.
BKAG has the higher dividend yield at 4.24%, compared with 1.01% for BKLC.
BKAG is categorized as Total Bond Market, while BKLC is Large Cap Growth Equities. BKAG tracks Bloomberg US Aggregate Total Return Index, while BKLC tracks Morningstar US Large Cap Index.
BKLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BKAG and BKLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer