PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKAG vs. BKLC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BKAG vs. BKLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Core Bond ETF (BKAG) and BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BKAG vs. BKLC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BKAG
BNY Mellon Core Bond ETF
0.16%7.23%1.17%5.67%-13.29%-1.46%2.15%
BKLC
BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF
-3.87%18.06%25.56%30.88%-20.52%27.41%36.06%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKAG achieves a 0.16% return, which is significantly higher than BKLC's -3.87% return.


BKAG

1D
-0.06%
1M
-1.30%
YTD
0.16%
6M
0.86%
1Y
4.03%
3Y*
3.59%
5Y*
0.21%
10Y*

BKLC

1D
0.75%
1M
-4.29%
YTD
-3.87%
6M
-1.78%
1Y
18.47%
3Y*
19.74%
5Y*
12.21%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BKAG vs. BKLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKAG has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than BKLC's 0.00% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

BKAG vs. BKLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKAG
BKAG Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
BKAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKAG Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
BKAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKAG Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

BKLC
BKLC Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
BKLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKLC Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
BKLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKLC Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKAG vs. BKLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Core Bond ETF (BKAG) and BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BKAGBKLCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.93

1.00

-0.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.30

1.51

-0.21

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.23

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.74

1.63

+0.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.87

7.54

-2.67

BKAG vs. BKLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKAG Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is comparable to the BKLC Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKAG and BKLC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BKAGBKLCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

1.00

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

0.71

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.01

0.99

-0.98

Correlation

The correlation between BKAG and BKLC is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

BKAG vs. BKLC - Dividend Comparison

BKAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.27%, more than BKLC's 1.17% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
BKAG
BNY Mellon Core Bond ETF
4.27%4.17%4.26%3.33%2.49%1.55%1.16%
BKLC
BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF
1.17%1.05%1.22%1.35%1.64%1.10%0.84%

Drawdowns

BKAG vs. BKLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKAG drawdown since its inception was -18.53%, smaller than the maximum BKLC drawdown of -26.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKAG and BKLC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BKAGBKLCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.53%

-26.14%

+7.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.51%

-12.05%

+9.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.00%

-26.14%

+8.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.45%

-5.71%

+3.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.26%

-5.40%

-1.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.90%

2.60%

-1.70%

Volatility

BKAG vs. BKLC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNY Mellon Core Bond ETF (BKAG) is 1.72%, while BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC) has a volatility of 5.43%. This indicates that BKAG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BKLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BKAGBKLCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.72%

5.43%

-3.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.71%

9.71%

-7.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.37%

18.50%

-14.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.99%

17.18%

-11.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.59%

17.58%

-11.99%