PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKAG vs. BAGSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BKAG vs. BAGSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Core Bond ETF (BKAG) and Baird Aggregate Bond Fund (BAGSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKAG achieves a -0.52% return, which is significantly lower than BAGSX's -0.44% return.


BKAG

1D
-0.24%
1M
-1.17%
6M
-0.80%
YTD
-0.52%
1Y
1.88%
3Y*
3.90%
5Y*
-0.43%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-0.08%

BAGSX

1D
0.10%
1M
-0.84%
6M
-0.61%
YTD
-0.44%
1Y
2.04%
3Y*
3.99%
5Y*
-0.36%
10Y*
1.48%
ALL TIME*
3.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$13.02M$8.55M$6.67M

BKAG vs. BAGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BKAG
BNY Mellon Core Bond ETF
-0.52%7.23%1.17%5.67%-13.29%-1.46%2.12%
BAGSX
Baird Aggregate Bond Fund
-0.44%7.11%1.63%6.12%-13.52%-1.74%4.26%

Correlation

The correlation between BKAG and BAGSX is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2020

0.95

The correlation between BKAG and BAGSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BKAG vs. BAGSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BKAG
BKAG Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
BKAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKAG Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
BKAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKAG Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

BAGSX
BAGSX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
BAGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
BAGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BKAG vs. BAGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Core Bond ETF (BKAG) and Baird Aggregate Bond Fund (BAGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BKAGBAGSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.14

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.99

1.00

-0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.43

2.45

-0.02

BKAG vs. BAGSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKAG Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is comparable to the BAGSX Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKAG and BAGSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BKAG vs. BAGSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKAG drawdown since its inception was -18.53%, roughly equal to the maximum BAGSX drawdown of -18.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKAG and BAGSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BKAGBAGSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.53%

-18.97%

+0.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.76%

-2.84%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.99%

-5.11%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.98%

-18.84%

+0.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.10%

-2.26%

-0.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.99%

-2.52%

-4.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.12%

1.16%

-0.04%

Volatility

BKAG vs. BAGSX - Volatility Comparison

BNY Mellon Core Bond ETF (BKAG) and Baird Aggregate Bond Fund (BAGSX) have volatilities of 0.96% and 0.93%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BKAGBAGSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.96%

0.93%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.92%

2.88%

+0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.80%

3.70%

+0.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.02%

5.93%

+0.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.51%

4.90%

+0.61%

BKAG vs. BAGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKAG has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than BAGSX's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

BKAG vs. BAGSX - Dividend Comparison

BKAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.33%, more than BAGSX's 3.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BAGSX
Baird Aggregate Bond Fund
3.86%3.69%3.62%3.10%2.33%1.68%3.02%2.41%2.53%2.21%1.96%2.14%
BKAG
BNY Mellon Core Bond ETF
3.95%4.17%4.26%3.33%2.49%1.55%1.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, BKAG and BAGSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BKAG has higher volatility (0.96%) compared to BAGSX (0.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKAG dropped -18.53% vs BAGSX's -18.97%.

BAGSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.77 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BKAG and BAGSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer