PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BJK vs. HODL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BJK vs. HODL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Gaming ETF (BJK) and VanEck Bitcoin Trust (HODL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BJK vs. HODL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BJK
VanEck Vectors Gaming ETF
-14.16%4.15%2.11%
HODL
VanEck Bitcoin Trust
-22.04%-6.42%99.75%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BJK achieves a -14.16% return, which is significantly higher than HODL's -22.04% return.


BJK

1D
1.58%
1M
-3.52%
YTD
-14.16%
6M
-18.96%
1Y
-3.77%
3Y*
-5.09%
5Y*
-6.70%
10Y*
2.46%

HODL

1D
0.63%
1M
-1.38%
YTD
-22.04%
6M
-42.00%
1Y
-19.80%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BJK vs. HODL - Expense Ratio Comparison

BJK has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than HODL's 0.25% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BJK vs. HODL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BJK
BJK Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
BJK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BJK Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
BJK Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
BJK Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
BJK Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

HODL
HODL Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
HODL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HODL Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
HODL Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
HODL Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
HODL Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BJK vs. HODL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Gaming ETF (BJK) and VanEck Bitcoin Trust (HODL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BJKHODLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.17

-0.44

+0.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.10

-0.37

+0.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

0.96

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.12

-0.35

+0.23

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.28

-0.75

+0.47

BJK vs. HODL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BJK Sharpe Ratio is -0.17, which is higher than the HODL Sharpe Ratio of -0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BJK and HODL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BJKHODLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.17

-0.44

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.06

0.37

-0.31

Correlation

The correlation between BJK and HODL is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

BJK vs. HODL - Dividend Comparison

BJK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.89%, while HODL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BJK
VanEck Vectors Gaming ETF
3.89%3.34%2.88%1.68%0.44%0.79%0.47%2.95%3.43%2.31%3.15%4.09%
HODL
VanEck Bitcoin Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

BJK vs. HODL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BJK drawdown since its inception was -71.12%, which is greater than HODL's maximum drawdown of -49.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BJK and HODL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BJKHODLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.12%

-49.25%

-21.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.40%

-49.25%

+22.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.61%

-45.67%

+13.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.48%

-14.14%

-10.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.22%

23.20%

-11.98%

Volatility

BJK vs. HODL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Gaming ETF (BJK) is 7.24%, while VanEck Bitcoin Trust (HODL) has a volatility of 12.99%. This indicates that BJK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HODL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BJKHODLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.24%

12.99%

-5.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.25%

36.72%

-23.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.82%

45.07%

-23.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.48%

50.90%

-26.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.03%

50.90%

-25.87%