BJK vs. LVS
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Vectors Gaming ETF (BJK) and Las Vegas Sands Corp. (LVS).
BJK is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the S-Network Global Gaming Index. It was launched on Jan 22, 2008.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BJK or LVS.
Key characteristics
| BJK | LVS | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 3.62% | 4.18% |
| 1Y Return | 15.06% | 7.05% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -2.86% | 7.96% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 3.01% | -3.63% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 2.33% | 1.01% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.58 | 0.22 |
| Sortino Ratio | 0.94 | 0.53 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.11 | 1.06 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.36 | 0.11 |
| Martin Ratio | 1.74 | 0.42 |
| Ulcer Index | 6.67% | 15.65% |
| Daily Std Dev | 19.89% | 29.44% |
| Max Drawdown | -71.13% | -99.02% |
| Current Drawdown | -20.79% | -46.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between BJK and LVS is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
BJK vs. LVS - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, BJK achieves a 3.62% return, which is significantly lower than LVS's 4.18% return. Over the past 10 years, BJK has outperformed LVS with an annualized return of 2.33%, while LVS has yielded a comparatively lower 1.01% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BJK vs. LVS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Gaming ETF (BJK) and Las Vegas Sands Corp. (LVS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BJK vs. LVS - Dividend Comparison
BJK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, more than LVS's 1.59% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BJK VanEck Vectors Gaming ETF | 1.62% | 1.68% | 0.44% | 0.79% | 0.47% | 2.95% | 3.43% | 2.31% | 3.15% | 4.09% | 4.90% | 0.97% |
LVS Las Vegas Sands Corp. | 1.59% | 0.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.33% | 4.46% | 5.76% | 4.20% | 5.39% | 5.93% | 3.44% | 1.78% |
Drawdowns
BJK vs. LVS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BJK drawdown since its inception was -71.13%, smaller than the maximum LVS drawdown of -99.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BJK and LVS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BJK vs. LVS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Gaming ETF (BJK) is 4.97%, while Las Vegas Sands Corp. (LVS) has a volatility of 7.04%. This indicates that BJK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LVS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.