PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BJK vs. LVS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between BJK and LVS is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.7

Performance

BJK vs. LVS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Gaming ETF (BJK) and Las Vegas Sands Corp. (LVS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
1.82%
9.12%
BJK
LVS

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BJK:

0.14

LVS:

-0.21

Sortino Ratio

BJK:

0.31

LVS:

-0.10

Omega Ratio

BJK:

1.04

LVS:

0.99

Calmar Ratio

BJK:

0.08

LVS:

-0.11

Martin Ratio

BJK:

0.36

LVS:

-0.39

Ulcer Index

BJK:

7.12%

LVS:

16.01%

Daily Std Dev

BJK:

18.94%

LVS:

29.65%

Max Drawdown

BJK:

-71.12%

LVS:

-99.02%

Current Drawdown

BJK:

-25.57%

LVS:

-52.78%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BJK achieves a -1.26% return, which is significantly higher than LVS's -13.55% return. Over the past 10 years, BJK has outperformed LVS with an annualized return of 3.36%, while LVS has yielded a comparatively lower 1.14% annualized return.


BJK

YTD

-1.26%

1M

-1.47%

6M

1.82%

1Y

-1.35%

5Y*

-0.50%

10Y*

3.36%

LVS

YTD

-13.55%

1M

-12.98%

6M

9.11%

1Y

-8.76%

5Y*

-8.94%

10Y*

1.14%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BJK vs. LVS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BJK
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BJK is 1010
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BJK is 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BJK is 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BJK is 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BJK is 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BJK is 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

LVS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LVS is 3434
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LVS is 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LVS is 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LVS is 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LVS is 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LVS is 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BJK vs. LVS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Gaming ETF (BJK) and Las Vegas Sands Corp. (LVS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BJK, currently valued at 0.14, compared to the broader market0.002.004.000.14-0.21
The chart of Sortino ratio for BJK, currently valued at 0.31, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.000.31-0.10
The chart of Omega ratio for BJK, currently valued at 1.04, compared to the broader market1.002.003.001.040.99
The chart of Calmar ratio for BJK, currently valued at 0.08, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.08-0.13
The chart of Martin ratio for BJK, currently valued at 0.36, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.000.36-0.39
BJK
LVS

The current BJK Sharpe Ratio is 0.14, which is higher than the LVS Sharpe Ratio of -0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BJK and LVS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.14
-0.21
BJK
LVS

Dividends

BJK vs. LVS - Dividend Comparison

BJK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%, more than LVS's 1.80% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
BJK
VanEck Vectors Gaming ETF
2.91%2.88%1.68%0.44%0.79%0.47%2.95%3.43%2.31%3.15%4.09%4.90%
LVS
Las Vegas Sands Corp.
1.80%1.56%0.81%0.00%0.00%1.33%4.46%5.76%4.20%5.39%5.93%3.44%

Drawdowns

BJK vs. LVS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BJK drawdown since its inception was -71.12%, smaller than the maximum LVS drawdown of -99.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BJK and LVS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-45.00%-40.00%-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-25.57%
-37.73%
BJK
LVS

Volatility

BJK vs. LVS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Gaming ETF (BJK) is 5.33%, while Las Vegas Sands Corp. (LVS) has a volatility of 9.46%. This indicates that BJK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LVS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
5.33%
9.46%
BJK
LVS
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab