BJK vs. LVS

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Vectors Gaming ETF (BJK) and Las Vegas Sands Corp. (LVS).

BJK is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the S-Network Global Gaming Index. It was launched on Jan 22, 2008.

Performance

BJK vs. LVS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Gaming ETF (BJK) and Las Vegas Sands Corp. (LVS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BJK vs. LVS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BJK VanEck Vectors Gaming ETF	-14.16%	4.15%	-1.39%	11.52%	-12.83%	-4.30%	12.72%	30.17%	-26.79%	41.11%
LVS Las Vegas Sands Corp.	-16.11%	29.45%	6.21%	3.15%	27.71%	-36.85%	-11.95%	39.54%	-21.62%	36.16%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BJK achieves a -14.16% return, which is significantly higher than LVS's -16.11% return. Over the past 10 years, BJK has underperformed LVS with an annualized return of 2.46%, while LVS has yielded a comparatively higher 3.07% annualized return.

BJK

• 1D: 1.58%
• 1M: -3.52%
• YTD: -14.16%
• 6M: -18.96%
• 1Y: -3.77%
• 3Y*: -5.09%
• 5Y*: -6.70%
• 10Y*: 2.46%

LVS

• 1D: 0.82%
• 1M: -3.62%
• YTD: -16.11%
• 6M: 0.10%
• 1Y: 41.64%
• 3Y*: -0.15%
• 5Y*: -1.56%
• 10Y*: 3.07%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

BJK vs. LVS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BJK

BJK Risk / Return Rank: 9
BJK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
BJK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
BJK Omega Ratio Rank: 8
BJK Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
BJK Martin Ratio Rank: 10

LVS

LVS Risk / Return Rank: 72
LVS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
LVS Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
LVS Omega Ratio Rank: 72
LVS Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
LVS Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BJK vs. LVS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Gaming ETF (BJK) and Las Vegas Sands Corp. (LVS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BJK	LVS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.17	1.04	-1.22
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.10	1.57	-1.68
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	1.23	-0.25
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.12	1.72	-1.84
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.28	4.01	-4.29
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BJK vs. LVS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BJK Sharpe Ratio is -0.17, which is lower than the LVS Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BJK and LVS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BJK	LVS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.17	1.04	-1.22
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.27	-0.04	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.10	0.08	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.06	0.05	0.00

Correlation

The correlation between BJK and LVS is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

BJK vs. LVS - Dividend Comparison

BJK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.89%, more than LVS's 1.93% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BJK VanEck Vectors Gaming ETF	3.89%	3.34%	2.88%	1.68%	0.44%	0.79%	0.47%	2.95%	3.43%	2.31%	3.15%	4.09%
LVS Las Vegas Sands Corp.	1.93%	1.54%	1.56%	0.81%	0.00%	0.00%	1.33%	4.46%	5.76%	4.20%	5.39%	5.93%

Drawdowns

BJK vs. LVS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BJK drawdown since its inception was -71.12%, smaller than the maximum LVS drawdown of -99.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BJK and LVS.

Drawdown Indicators

	BJK	LVS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.12%	-99.02%	+27.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.40%	-25.33%	-1.07%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.48%	-52.62%	+9.14%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-56.43%	-58.77%	+2.34%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-32.61%	-40.68%	+8.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.48%	-50.02%	+25.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.22%	10.85%	+0.37%

Volatility

BJK vs. LVS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Gaming ETF (BJK) is 7.24%, while Las Vegas Sands Corp. (LVS) has a volatility of 8.10%. This indicates that BJK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LVS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BJK	LVS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.24%	8.10%	-0.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.25%	29.09%	-15.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.82%	40.12%	-18.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.48%	40.69%	-16.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.03%	38.84%	-13.81%