BISAX vs. BINCX
Compare and contrast key facts about Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund (BISAX) and Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class C (BINCX).
BISAX is managed by Brandes. It was launched on Jan 30, 2012. BINCX is an actively managed fund by Brandes. It was launched on Jan 31, 2013.
Performance
BISAX vs. BINCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BISAX vs. BINCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BISAX Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund | -0.96% | 45.50% | 23.18% | 39.03% | -8.68% | 18.39% | 4.62% | 6.80% | -20.13% | 11.52% |
BINCX Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class C | -1.05% | 44.63% | 22.20% | 37.99% | -9.36% | 18.22% | 3.79% | 6.06% | -20.76% | 10.71% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BISAX achieves a -0.96% return, which is significantly higher than BINCX's -1.05% return. Over the past 10 years, BISAX has outperformed BINCX with an annualized return of 10.74%, while BINCX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.00% annualized return.
BISAX
- 1D
- 2.50%
- 1M
- -7.07%
- YTD
- -0.96%
- 6M
- 2.27%
- 1Y
- 30.16%
- 3Y*
- 29.55%
- 5Y*
- 18.64%
- 10Y*
- 10.74%
BINCX
- 1D
- 2.55%
- 1M
- -7.08%
- YTD
- -1.05%
- 6M
- 1.99%
- 1Y
- 29.44%
- 3Y*
- 28.66%
- 5Y*
- 17.94%
- 10Y*
- 10.00%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BISAX vs. BINCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BISAX has a 1.36% expense ratio, which is lower than BINCX's 1.99% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BISAX vs. BINCX — Risk / Return Rank
BISAX
BINCX
BISAX vs. BINCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund (BISAX) and Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class C (BINCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BISAX | BINCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.27 | 2.22 | +0.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.93 | 2.88 | +0.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.42 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.46 | 2.38 | +0.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.77 | 9.46 | +0.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BISAX | BINCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.27 | 2.22 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.36 | 1.31 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 | 0.71 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 0.64 | +0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between BISAX and BINCX is 1.00, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BISAX vs. BINCX - Dividend Comparison
BISAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, more than BINCX's 3.04% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BISAX Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund | 3.26% | 3.23% | 3.06% | 2.81% | 3.87% | 3.46% | 0.81% | 0.66% | 3.88% | 8.33% | 4.00% | 3.44% |
BINCX Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class C | 3.04% | 3.01% | 2.54% | 2.45% | 2.98% | 3.85% | 0.60% | 0.21% | 3.77% | 7.83% | 3.75% | 3.04% |
Drawdowns
BISAX vs. BINCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BISAX drawdown since its inception was -47.30%, roughly equal to the maximum BINCX drawdown of -48.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BISAX and BINCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BISAX | BINCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.30% | -48.15% | +0.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.63% | -11.66% | +0.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.44% | -31.97% | +0.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.30% | -48.15% | +0.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.13% | -9.14% | +0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.06% | -9.44% | +1.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.93% | 2.94% | -0.01% |
Volatility
BISAX vs. BINCX - Volatility Comparison
Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund (BISAX) and Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class C (BINCX) have volatilities of 5.97% and 6.00%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BISAX | BINCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.97% | 6.00% | -0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.39% | 9.41% | -0.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.57% | 13.58% | -0.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.78% | 13.78% | 0.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.21% | 14.18% | +0.03% |