PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BINCX vs. MWNIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BINCX vs. MWNIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class C (BINCX) and MFS International New Discovery Fund (MWNIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BINCX achieves a -1.57% return, which is significantly lower than MWNIX's 7.72% return. Over the past 10 years, BINCX has outperformed MWNIX with an annualized return of 9.84%, while MWNIX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.48% annualized return.


BINCX

1D
-0.49%
1M
-2.01%
YTD
-1.57%
6M
-0.90%
1Y
10.26%
3Y*
25.99%
5Y*
16.15%
10Y*
9.84%

MWNIX

1D
0.47%
1M
1.48%
YTD
7.72%
6M
7.82%
1Y
12.59%
3Y*
9.69%
5Y*
3.31%
10Y*
6.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BINCX vs. MWNIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BINCX
Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class C
-1.57%44.63%22.20%37.99%-9.36%18.22%3.79%6.06%-20.76%10.71%
MWNIX
MFS International New Discovery Fund
7.72%16.88%0.90%13.03%-18.63%5.06%9.98%22.85%-10.41%30.67%

Correlation

The correlation between BINCX and MWNIX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014

0.80

The correlation between BINCX and MWNIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BINCX vs. MWNIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BINCX
BINCX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
BINCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BINCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
BINCX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
BINCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
BINCX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

MWNIX
MWNIX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
MWNIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MWNIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
MWNIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
MWNIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
MWNIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BINCX vs. MWNIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class C (BINCX) and MFS International New Discovery Fund (MWNIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BINCXMWNIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.19

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.84

0.99

-0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.23

3.36

-1.13

BINCX vs. MWNIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BINCX Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is comparable to the MWNIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BINCX and MWNIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BINCX vs. MWNIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BINCX drawdown since its inception was -48.15%, smaller than the maximum MWNIX drawdown of -58.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BINCX and MWNIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BINCXMWNIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.15%

-58.38%

+10.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.66%

-11.78%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.66%

-15.12%

+3.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.97%

-33.67%

+1.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.15%

-34.72%

-13.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.62%

-0.90%

-8.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.40%

-9.56%

+0.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.38%

3.47%

+0.91%

Volatility

BINCX vs. MWNIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class C (BINCX) is 3.54%, while MFS International New Discovery Fund (MWNIX) has a volatility of 4.15%. This indicates that BINCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MWNIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BINCXMWNIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.54%

4.15%

-0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.40%

10.06%

+0.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.53%

11.93%

+0.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.91%

13.26%

+0.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.26%

13.99%

+0.27%

BINCX vs. MWNIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BINCX has a 1.99% expense ratio, which is higher than MWNIX's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

BINCX vs. MWNIX - Dividend Comparison

BINCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, more than MWNIX's 3.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BINCX
Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class C
3.06%3.01%2.54%2.45%2.98%3.85%0.60%0.21%3.77%7.83%3.75%3.04%
MWNIX
MFS International New Discovery Fund
3.01%3.24%7.61%4.05%5.68%5.06%3.90%2.67%6.68%1.63%1.09%1.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


BINCX and MWNIX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MWNIX has higher volatility (4.15%) compared to BINCX (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BINCX dropped -48.15% vs MWNIX's -58.38%.

MWNIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.98 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BINCX and MWNIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer