PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BINCX vs. KGGAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BINCX vs. KGGAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class C (BINCX) and Kopernik Global All-Cap Fund Class A (KGGAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BINCX achieves a 0.89% return, which is significantly lower than KGGAX's 10.36% return. Over the past 10 years, BINCX has underperformed KGGAX with an annualized return of 9.91%, while KGGAX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.39% annualized return.


BINCX

1D
-0.52%
1M
-0.83%
YTD
0.89%
6M
3.94%
1Y
14.82%
3Y*
28.37%
5Y*
16.12%
10Y*
9.91%

KGGAX

1D
-0.17%
1M
-0.80%
YTD
10.36%
6M
14.14%
1Y
43.25%
3Y*
23.04%
5Y*
11.04%
10Y*
13.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BINCX vs. KGGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BINCX
Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class C
0.89%44.63%22.20%37.99%-9.36%18.22%3.79%6.06%-20.76%10.71%
KGGAX
Kopernik Global All-Cap Fund Class A
10.36%64.46%-4.79%13.08%-9.24%16.59%36.89%9.76%-11.34%8.77%

Correlation

The correlation between BINCX and KGGAX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.60

The correlation between BINCX and KGGAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BINCX vs. KGGAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BINCX
BINCX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
BINCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BINCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
BINCX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
BINCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
BINCX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

KGGAX
KGGAX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
KGGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KGGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
KGGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
KGGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
KGGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BINCX vs. KGGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class C (BINCX) and Kopernik Global All-Cap Fund Class A (KGGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BINCXKGGAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.30

3.01

-1.70

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.96

3.71

-1.75

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.53

-0.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.40

4.14

-2.74

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.16

13.69

-9.53

BINCX vs. KGGAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BINCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is lower than the KGGAX Sharpe Ratio of 3.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BINCX and KGGAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BINCXKGGAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.30

3.01

-1.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.17

0.73

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

0.90

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.62

+0.03

Drawdowns

BINCX vs. KGGAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BINCX drawdown since its inception was -48.15%, which is greater than KGGAX's maximum drawdown of -45.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BINCX and KGGAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BINCXKGGAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.15%

-45.27%

-2.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.66%

-10.63%

-1.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.66%

-13.53%

+1.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.97%

-26.59%

-5.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.15%

-31.90%

-16.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.36%

-4.48%

-2.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.40%

-9.68%

+0.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.91%

3.21%

+0.70%

Volatility

BINCX vs. KGGAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class C (BINCX) is 3.13%, while Kopernik Global All-Cap Fund Class A (KGGAX) has a volatility of 3.74%. This indicates that BINCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KGGAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BINCXKGGAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.13%

3.74%

-0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.00%

12.12%

-2.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.40%

14.96%

-2.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.88%

15.12%

-1.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.26%

14.97%

-0.71%

BINCX vs. KGGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BINCX has a 1.99% expense ratio, which is higher than KGGAX's 1.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

BINCX vs. KGGAX - Dividend Comparison

BINCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.98%, less than KGGAX's 14.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BINCX
Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class C
2.98%3.01%2.54%2.45%2.98%3.85%0.60%0.21%3.77%7.83%3.75%3.04%
KGGAX
Kopernik Global All-Cap Fund Class A
14.60%16.11%1.04%8.29%13.22%9.00%4.59%2.72%0.00%4.12%3.09%0.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


BINCX and KGGAX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KGGAX has higher volatility (3.74%) compared to BINCX (3.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BINCX dropped -48.15% vs KGGAX's -45.27%.

KGGAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.01 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BINCX and KGGAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer