BINCX vs. BEMIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class C (BINCX) and Brandes Emerging Markets Fund (BEMIX).
BINCX is an actively managed fund by Brandes. It was launched on Jan 31, 2013. BEMIX is managed by Brandes. It was launched on Jan 30, 2011.
Performance
BINCX vs. BEMIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BINCX vs. BEMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BINCX Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class C | -3.51% | 44.63% | 22.20% | 37.99% | -9.36% | 18.22% | 3.79% | 6.06% | -20.76% | 10.71% |
BEMIX Brandes Emerging Markets Fund | 2.96% | 47.83% | 4.01% | 22.53% | -15.91% | 1.68% | -6.17% | 18.60% | -15.56% | 26.00% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BINCX achieves a -3.51% return, which is significantly lower than BEMIX's 2.96% return. Over the past 10 years, BINCX has outperformed BEMIX with an annualized return of 9.72%, while BEMIX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.04% annualized return.
BINCX
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- -10.67%
- YTD
- -3.51%
- 6M
- -0.78%
- 1Y
- 26.54%
- 3Y*
- 27.58%
- 5Y*
- 17.55%
- 10Y*
- 9.72%
BEMIX
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- -11.64%
- YTD
- 2.96%
- 6M
- 11.40%
- 1Y
- 45.15%
- 3Y*
- 21.23%
- 5Y*
- 9.84%
- 10Y*
- 8.04%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BINCX vs. BEMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BINCX has a 1.99% expense ratio, which is higher than BEMIX's 1.12% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BINCX vs. BEMIX — Risk / Return Rank
BINCX
BEMIX
BINCX vs. BEMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class C (BINCX) and Brandes Emerging Markets Fund (BEMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BINCX | BEMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.85 | 2.57 | -0.72 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.41 | 3.24 | -0.83 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.51 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.05 | 3.45 | -1.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.08 | 14.31 | -6.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BINCX | BEMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.85 | 2.57 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.28 | 0.61 | +0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | 0.48 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.24 | +0.39 |
Correlation
The correlation between BINCX and BEMIX is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BINCX vs. BEMIX - Dividend Comparison
BINCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, more than BEMIX's 2.09% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BINCX Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class C | 3.12% | 3.01% | 2.54% | 2.45% | 2.98% | 3.85% | 0.60% | 0.21% | 3.77% | 7.83% | 3.75% | 3.04% |
BEMIX Brandes Emerging Markets Fund | 2.09% | 2.15% | 3.04% | 2.45% | 2.86% | 2.31% | 1.31% | 2.56% | 1.55% | 1.41% | 2.20% | 1.54% |
Drawdowns
BINCX vs. BEMIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BINCX drawdown since its inception was -48.15%, roughly equal to the maximum BEMIX drawdown of -46.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BINCX and BEMIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BINCX | BEMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.15% | -46.05% | -2.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.66% | -12.07% | +0.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.97% | -36.37% | +4.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.15% | -46.05% | -2.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.40% | -12.07% | +0.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.44% | -14.32% | +4.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.95% | 2.91% | +0.04% |
Volatility
BINCX vs. BEMIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class C (BINCX) is 5.28%, while Brandes Emerging Markets Fund (BEMIX) has a volatility of 8.42%. This indicates that BINCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BEMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BINCX | BEMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.28% | 8.42% | -3.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.07% | 12.56% | -3.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.38% | 17.37% | -3.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.74% | 16.15% | -2.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.16% | 16.96% | -2.80% |