PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BISAX vs. FSTSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BISAX vs. FSTSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund (BISAX) and Fidelity Series International Small Cap Fund (FSTSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BISAX achieves a 1.11% return, which is significantly lower than FSTSX's 7.21% return. Over the past 10 years, BISAX has outperformed FSTSX with an annualized return of 10.66%, while FSTSX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.85% annualized return.


BISAX

1D
-0.49%
1M
-0.75%
YTD
1.11%
6M
4.25%
1Y
15.51%
3Y*
29.23%
5Y*
16.94%
10Y*
10.66%

FSTSX

1D
-1.54%
1M
1.97%
YTD
7.21%
6M
10.28%
1Y
17.16%
3Y*
15.66%
5Y*
6.25%
10Y*
9.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BISAX vs. FSTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BISAX
Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund
1.11%45.50%23.18%39.03%-8.68%18.39%4.62%6.80%-20.13%11.52%
FSTSX
Fidelity Series International Small Cap Fund
7.21%27.49%4.97%18.36%-26.25%18.29%19.61%28.24%-13.19%34.44%

Correlation

The correlation between BISAX and FSTSX is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2012

0.79

The correlation between BISAX and FSTSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BISAX vs. FSTSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BISAX
BISAX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
BISAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BISAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
BISAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
BISAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
BISAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

FSTSX
FSTSX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
FSTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
FSTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BISAX vs. FSTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund (BISAX) and Fidelity Series International Small Cap Fund (FSTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BISAXFSTSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.37

1.31

+0.06

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.05

1.92

+0.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.24

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.46

1.62

-0.16

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.37

5.50

-1.12

BISAX vs. FSTSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BISAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is comparable to the FSTSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BISAX and FSTSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BISAXFSTSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

1.31

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.23

0.38

+0.84

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

0.62

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.62

+0.20

Drawdowns

BISAX vs. FSTSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BISAX drawdown since its inception was -47.30%, which is greater than FSTSX's maximum drawdown of -38.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BISAX and FSTSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BISAXFSTSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.30%

-38.91%

-8.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.63%

-11.22%

-0.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.63%

-14.47%

+2.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.44%

-38.91%

+7.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.30%

-38.91%

-8.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.23%

-1.54%

-5.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.04%

-7.90%

-0.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.87%

3.30%

+0.57%

Volatility

BISAX vs. FSTSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund (BISAX) is 3.13%, while Fidelity Series International Small Cap Fund (FSTSX) has a volatility of 4.42%. This indicates that BISAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSTSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BISAXFSTSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.13%

4.42%

-1.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.97%

11.10%

-1.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.38%

13.95%

-1.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.88%

16.42%

-2.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.28%

15.94%

-1.66%

BISAX vs. FSTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BISAX has a 1.36% expense ratio, which is higher than FSTSX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

BISAX vs. FSTSX - Dividend Comparison

BISAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%, less than FSTSX's 14.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BISAX
Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund
3.19%3.23%3.06%2.81%3.87%3.46%0.81%0.66%3.88%8.33%4.00%3.44%
FSTSX
Fidelity Series International Small Cap Fund
14.21%15.24%10.22%3.34%6.38%13.22%0.81%4.27%10.99%6.30%4.01%7.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


BISAX and FSTSX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSTSX has higher volatility (4.42%) compared to BISAX (3.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BISAX dropped -47.30% vs FSTSX's -38.91%.

BISAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BISAX and FSTSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer