BISAX vs. PLTR
BISAX (Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund) is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund managed by Brandes, while PLTR (Palantir Technologies Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, BISAX returned 17.29%/yr vs 43.25%/yr for PLTR. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BISAX vs. PLTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BISAX achieves a 0.67% return, which is significantly higher than PLTR's -26.84% return.
BISAX
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- -0.48%
- 6M
- -1.60%
- YTD
- 0.67%
- 1Y
- 7.78%
- 3Y*
- 27.51%
- 5Y*
- 17.29%
- 10Y*
- 11.12%
PLTR
- 1D
- 2.56%
- 1M
- 1.60%
- 6M
- -27.52%
- YTD
- -26.84%
- 1Y
- -8.49%
- 3Y*
- 99.41%
- 5Y*
- 43.25%
- 10Y*
- —
BISAX vs. PLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BISAX Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund | 0.67% | 45.50% | 23.18% | 39.03% | -8.68% | 18.39% | 23.23% |
PLTR Palantir Technologies Inc. | -26.84% | 135.03% | 340.48% | 167.45% | -64.74% | -22.68% | 135.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between BISAX and PLTR is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2020 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BISAX vs. PLTR — Risk / Return Rank
BISAX
PLTR
BISAX vs. PLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund (BISAX) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BISAX | PLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.01 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.65 | -0.18 | +0.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.57 | -0.36 | +1.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BISAX vs. PLTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BISAX drawdown since its inception was -47.30%, smaller than the maximum PLTR drawdown of -84.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BISAX and PLTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BISAX | PLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.30% | -84.62% | +37.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.63% | -48.22% | +36.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.63% | -48.22% | +36.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.44% | -79.14% | +47.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.63% | -37.23% | +29.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.05% | -40.26% | +32.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.84% | 23.88% | -19.04% |
Volatility
BISAX vs. PLTR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund (BISAX) is 4.21%, while Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) has a volatility of 16.54%. This indicates that BISAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BISAX | PLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.21% | 16.54% | -12.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.67% | 39.51% | -28.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.72% | 51.70% | -38.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.92% | 65.65% | -51.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.12% | 69.61% | -55.49% |
Dividends
BISAX vs. PLTR - Dividend Comparison
BISAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, while PLTR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BISAX Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund | 3.65% | 3.23% | 3.06% | 2.81% | 3.87% | 3.46% | 0.81% | 0.66% | 3.88% | 8.33% | 4.00% | 3.44% |
PLTR Palantir Technologies Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BISAX and PLTR have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PLTR has higher volatility (16.54%) compared to BISAX (4.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BISAX dropped -47.30% vs PLTR's -84.62%.
BISAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.60 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BISAX and PLTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer