PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BINCX vs. MECIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BINCX vs. MECIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class C (BINCX) and AMG GW&K International Small Cap Fund (MECIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with BINCX having a 7.56% return and MECIX slightly lower at 7.29%. Over the past 10 years, BINCX has outperformed MECIX with an annualized return of 10.87%, while MECIX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.69% annualized return.


BINCX

1D
1.47%
1M
7.58%
6M
3.07%
YTD
7.56%
1Y
13.42%
3Y*
27.56%
5Y*
18.21%
10Y*
10.87%
ALL TIME*
9.18%

MECIX

1D
2.23%
1M
0.58%
6M
3.95%
YTD
7.29%
1Y
8.32%
3Y*
8.12%
5Y*
1.07%
10Y*
4.69%
ALL TIME*
8.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

BINCX vs. MECIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BINCX
Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class C
7.56%44.63%22.20%37.99%-9.36%18.22%3.79%6.06%-20.76%10.71%
MECIX
AMG GW&K International Small Cap Fund
7.29%16.57%2.15%6.23%-20.34%2.33%1.72%9.90%-6.00%22.41%

Correlation

The correlation between BINCX and MECIX is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014

0.64

The correlation between BINCX and MECIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (all time) to 0.79 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BINCX vs. MECIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BINCX
BINCX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
BINCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BINCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
BINCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
BINCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
BINCX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

MECIX
MECIX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
MECIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MECIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
MECIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
MECIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
MECIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BINCX vs. MECIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class C (BINCX) and AMG GW&K International Small Cap Fund (MECIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BINCXMECIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.12

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.14

0.84

+0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.60

2.59

+0.01

BINCX vs. MECIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BINCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is higher than the MECIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BINCX and MECIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BINCX vs. MECIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BINCX drawdown since its inception was -48.15%, smaller than the maximum MECIX drawdown of -68.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BINCX and MECIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BINCXMECIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.15%

-68.42%

+20.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.66%

-10.60%

-1.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.66%

-17.72%

+6.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.97%

-37.38%

+5.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.15%

-51.20%

+3.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.24%

-2.85%

+1.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.38%

-14.16%

+4.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.10%

3.41%

+1.69%

Volatility

BINCX vs. MECIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class C (BINCX) is 3.42%, while AMG GW&K International Small Cap Fund (MECIX) has a volatility of 4.17%. This indicates that BINCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MECIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BINCXMECIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.42%

4.17%

-0.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.80%

10.76%

+0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.88%

13.99%

-1.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.89%

14.91%

-1.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.10%

19.23%

-5.13%

BINCX vs. MECIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BINCX has a 1.99% expense ratio, which is higher than MECIX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

BINCX vs. MECIX - Dividend Comparison

BINCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%, while MECIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BINCX
Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class C
3.19%3.01%2.54%2.45%2.98%3.85%0.60%0.21%3.77%7.83%3.75%3.04%
MECIX
AMG GW&K International Small Cap Fund
0.00%0.00%2.06%1.51%1.34%0.68%0.00%0.02%9.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BINCX and MECIX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MECIX has higher volatility (4.17%) compared to BINCX (3.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BINCX dropped -48.15% vs MECIX's -68.42%.

BINCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.03 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BINCX and MECIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer