BINCX vs. MECIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class C (BINCX) and AMG GW&K International Small Cap Fund (MECIX).
BINCX is an actively managed fund by Brandes. It was launched on Jan 31, 2013. MECIX is managed by AMG. It was launched on Jun 24, 1993.
Performance
BINCX vs. MECIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BINCX vs. MECIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BINCX Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class C | -1.05% | 44.63% | 22.20% | 37.99% | -9.36% | 18.22% | 3.79% | 6.06% | -20.76% | 10.71% |
MECIX AMG GW&K International Small Cap Fund | -0.13% | 16.57% | 2.15% | 6.23% | -20.34% | 2.33% | 1.72% | 9.90% | -6.00% | 22.41% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BINCX achieves a -1.05% return, which is significantly lower than MECIX's -0.13% return. Over the past 10 years, BINCX has outperformed MECIX with an annualized return of 10.00%, while MECIX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.53% annualized return.
BINCX
- 1D
- 2.55%
- 1M
- -7.08%
- YTD
- -1.05%
- 6M
- 1.99%
- 1Y
- 29.44%
- 3Y*
- 28.66%
- 5Y*
- 17.94%
- 10Y*
- 10.00%
MECIX
- 1D
- 2.38%
- 1M
- -7.34%
- YTD
- -0.13%
- 6M
- -0.76%
- 1Y
- 16.60%
- 3Y*
- 5.87%
- 5Y*
- -0.07%
- 10Y*
- 5.53%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BINCX vs. MECIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BINCX has a 1.99% expense ratio, which is higher than MECIX's 0.99% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BINCX vs. MECIX — Risk / Return Rank
BINCX
MECIX
BINCX vs. MECIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class C (BINCX) and AMG GW&K International Small Cap Fund (MECIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BINCX | MECIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.22 | 1.09 | +1.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.88 | 1.45 | +1.42 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.21 | +0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.38 | 1.34 | +1.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.46 | 4.79 | +4.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BINCX | MECIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.22 | 1.09 | +1.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.31 | -0.01 | +1.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 | 0.29 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.42 | +0.22 |
Correlation
The correlation between BINCX and MECIX is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
BINCX vs. MECIX - Dividend Comparison
BINCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, while MECIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BINCX Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class C | 3.04% | 3.01% | 2.54% | 2.45% | 2.98% | 3.85% | 0.60% | 0.21% | 3.77% | 7.83% | 3.75% | 3.04% |
MECIX AMG GW&K International Small Cap Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.06% | 1.51% | 1.34% | 0.68% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 9.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
BINCX vs. MECIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BINCX drawdown since its inception was -48.15%, smaller than the maximum MECIX drawdown of -68.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BINCX and MECIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BINCX | MECIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.15% | -68.42% | +20.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.66% | -10.60% | -1.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.97% | -37.38% | +5.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.15% | -51.20% | +3.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.14% | -9.56% | +0.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.44% | -14.27% | +4.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.94% | 3.10% | -0.16% |
Volatility
BINCX vs. MECIX - Volatility Comparison
Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class C (BINCX) and AMG GW&K International Small Cap Fund (MECIX) have volatilities of 6.00% and 6.22%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BINCX | MECIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.00% | 6.22% | -0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.41% | 10.76% | -1.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.58% | 15.34% | -1.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.78% | 14.75% | -0.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.18% | 19.30% | -5.12% |