BIP-UN.TO vs. UL
BIP-UN.TO (Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P) and UL (The Unilever Group) are both stocks. BIP-UN.TO operates in Utilities - Diversified (Utilities), while UL operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, BIP-UN.TO returned 30.11%/yr vs 6.24%/yr for UL. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BIP-UN.TO vs. UL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
BIP-UN.TO is traded in CAD, while UL is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the UL values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BIP-UN.TO achieves a 14.93% return, which is significantly higher than UL's -6.39% return. Over the past 10 years, BIP-UN.TO has outperformed UL with an annualized return of 30.11%, while UL has yielded a comparatively lower 6.24% annualized return.
BIP-UN.TO
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 3.28%
- YTD
- 14.93%
- 6M
- 14.64%
- 1Y
- 22.29%
- 3Y*
- 8.28%
- 5Y*
- 18.36%
- 10Y*
- 30.11%
UL
- 1D
- 1.32%
- 1M
- 5.64%
- YTD
- -6.39%
- 6M
- -6.29%
- 1Y
- -12.93%
- 3Y*
- 6.66%
- 5Y*
- 3.63%
- 10Y*
- 6.24%
BIP-UN.TO vs. UL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIP-UN.TO Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P | 14.93% | 10.04% | 15.27% | 4.54% | 27.87% | 27.84% | 14.53% | 46.25% | -11.04% | 33.26% |
UL The Unilever Group | -6.39% | 1.12% | 31.14% | -2.54% | 3.34% | -7.65% | 6.45% | 8.22% | 5.88% | 30.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between BIP-UN.TO and UL is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2009 | 0.15 |
Fundamentals
BIP-UN.TO:
CA$24.64B
UL:
$129.35B
BIP-UN.TO:
$0.91
UL:
€5.06
BIP-UN.TO:
42.33
UL:
10.06
BIP-UN.TO:
0.22
UL:
1.97
BIP-UN.TO:
0.74
UL:
1.09
BIP-UN.TO:
3.82
UL:
7.20
BIP-UN.TO:
$24.01B
UL:
€109.27B
BIP-UN.TO:
$6.49B
UL:
€90.89B
BIP-UN.TO:
$11.14B
UL:
€24.12B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BIP-UN.TO vs. UL — Risk / Return Rank
BIP-UN.TO
UL
BIP-UN.TO vs. UL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P (BIP-UN.TO) and The Unilever Group (UL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BIP-UN.TO | UL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 0.91 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.88 | -0.54 | +2.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.20 | -1.10 | +5.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BIP-UN.TO vs. UL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BIP-UN.TO drawdown since its inception was -46.85%, which is greater than UL's maximum drawdown of -40.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIP-UN.TO and UL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BIP-UN.TO | UL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.85% | -40.57% | -6.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.91% | -24.09% | +12.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.88% | -24.09% | -14.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.39% | -24.28% | -20.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.85% | -29.74% | -17.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.43% | -17.92% | +16.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.46% | -8.98% | +2.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.33% | 11.88% | -6.55% |
Volatility
BIP-UN.TO vs. UL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P (BIP-UN.TO) is 4.57%, while The Unilever Group (UL) has a volatility of 6.16%. This indicates that BIP-UN.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BIP-UN.TO | UL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.57% | 6.16% | -1.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.01% | 16.74% | -2.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.22% | 22.17% | -3.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.95% | 21.78% | +11.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.57% | 22.59% | +15.98% |
Dividends
BIP-UN.TO vs. UL - Dividend Comparison
BIP-UN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.55%, more than UL's 3.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIP-UN.TO Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P | 4.55% | 5.04% | 4.85% | 5.00% | 4.23% | 3.97% | 5.61% | 5.62% | 6.65% | 5.64% | 5.16% | 10.13% |
UL The Unilever Group | 3.87% | 3.51% | 3.29% | 3.83% | 3.57% | 3.77% | 3.07% | 3.18% | 3.49% | 2.80% | 3.42% | 3.02% |
Financials
BIP-UN.TO vs. UL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P and The Unilever Group. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BIP-UN.TO vs. UL - Profitability Comparison
BIP-UN.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P reported a gross profit of 1.70B and revenue of 6.30B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.9%.
UL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Unilever Group reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 18.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
BIP-UN.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P reported an operating income of 1.59B and revenue of 6.30B, resulting in an operating margin of 25.2%.
UL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Unilever Group reported an operating income of 4.13B and revenue of 18.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.5%.
BIP-UN.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P reported a net income of -86.00M and revenue of 6.30B, resulting in a net margin of -1.4%.
UL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Unilever Group reported a net income of 2.56B and revenue of 18.38B, resulting in a net margin of 14.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BIP-UN.TO and UL have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for BIP-UN.TO and UL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer