BIP-UN.TO vs. ATD.TO

In the year-to-date period, BIP-UN.TO achieves a 19.15% return, which is significantly higher than ATD.TO's 1.35% return. Over the past 10 years, BIP-UN.TO has underperformed ATD.TO with an annualized return of 9.90%, while ATD.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 14.78% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P (BIP-UN.TO) and Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. (ATD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

BIP-UN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.49%, more than ATD.TO's 0.67% yield.

The maximum BIP-UN.TO drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, roughly equal to the maximum ATD.TO drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIP-UN.TO and ATD.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P (BIP-UN.TO) and Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. (ATD.TO) have volatilities of 7.21% and 7.13%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P and Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.