BIP-UN.TO vs. ATD.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P (BIP-UN.TO) and Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. (ATD.TO).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BIP-UN.TO or ATD.TO.
Key characteristics
BIP-UN.TO | ATD.TO | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 0.41% | -3.04% |
1Y Return | -12.40% | 14.63% |
3Y Return (Ann) | 2.12% | 21.09% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 5.28% | 13.23% |
10Y Return (Ann) | 11.69% | 18.14% |
Sharpe Ratio | -0.37 | 0.79 |
Daily Std Dev | 34.10% | 19.53% |
Max Drawdown | -100.00% | -100.00% |
Current Drawdown | -99.95% | -99.99% |
Fundamentals
BIP-UN.TO | ATD.TO | |
---|---|---|
Market Cap | CA$19.37B | CA$71.90B |
EPS | CA$0.42 | CA$4.16 |
PE Ratio | 99.95 | 17.97 |
Revenue (TTM) | CA$18.90B | CA$67.94B |
Gross Profit (TTM) | CA$3.92B | CA$11.00B |
EBITDA (TTM) | CA$7.37B | CA$5.22B |
Correlation
The correlation between BIP-UN.TO and ATD.TO is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
BIP-UN.TO vs. ATD.TO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, BIP-UN.TO achieves a 0.41% return, which is significantly higher than ATD.TO's -3.04% return. Over the past 10 years, BIP-UN.TO has underperformed ATD.TO with an annualized return of 11.69%, while ATD.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 18.14% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BIP-UN.TO vs. ATD.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P (BIP-UN.TO) and Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. (ATD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BIP-UN.TO vs. ATD.TO - Dividend Comparison
BIP-UN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, more than ATD.TO's 0.83% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P | 3.74% | 3.66% | 2.48% | 1.18% | 1.41% | 1.38% | 1.77% | 1.37% | 0.89% | 0.80% | 0.78% | 0.82% |
Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. | 0.83% | 0.76% | 0.79% | 0.70% | 0.69% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
BIP-UN.TO vs. ATD.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BIP-UN.TO drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, roughly equal to the maximum ATD.TO drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIP-UN.TO and ATD.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BIP-UN.TO vs. ATD.TO - Volatility Comparison
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P (BIP-UN.TO) has a higher volatility of 7.85% compared to Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. (ATD.TO) at 5.08%. This indicates that BIP-UN.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ATD.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
BIP-UN.TO vs. ATD.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P and Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities