PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BIP-UN.TO vs. BIP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

BIP-UN.TO vs. BIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P (BIP-UN.TO) and Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP (BIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BIP-UN.TO vs. BIP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BIP-UN.TO
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P
6.86%12.33%17.68%6.51%-14.05%28.76%13.73%47.33%-9.97%34.03%
BIP
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP
6.59%9.87%15.54%4.30%-15.08%26.62%13.50%43.94%-12.30%30.82%
Different Trading Currencies

BIP-UN.TO is traded in CAD, while BIP is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BIP values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BIP-UN.TO:

CA$23.09B

BIP:

$16.62B

EPS

BIP-UN.TO:

CA$1.15

BIP:

$1.15

PE Ratio

BIP-UN.TO:

43.70

BIP:

31.46

PEG Ratio

BIP-UN.TO:

0.23

BIP:

0.16

PS Ratio

BIP-UN.TO:

1.00

BIP:

0.72

PB Ratio

BIP-UN.TO:

4.72

BIP:

3.40

Total Revenue (TTM)

BIP-UN.TO:

CA$23.10B

BIP:

$23.10B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BIP-UN.TO:

CA$6.22B

BIP:

$6.22B

EBITDA (TTM)

BIP-UN.TO:

CA$11.01B

BIP:

$11.01B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIP-UN.TO achieves a 6.86% return, which is significantly higher than BIP's 4.00% return. Over the past 10 years, BIP-UN.TO has outperformed BIP with an annualized return of 16.01%, while BIP has yielded a comparatively lower 13.57% annualized return.


BIP-UN.TO

1D
2.49%
1M
-5.69%
YTD
6.86%
6M
13.04%
1Y
25.67%
3Y*
10.80%
5Y*
8.69%
10Y*
16.01%

BIP

1D
0.00%
1M
-7.95%
YTD
4.00%
6M
9.59%
1Y
20.23%
3Y*
7.77%
5Y*
6.26%
10Y*
13.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BIP-UN.TO vs. BIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIP-UN.TO
BIP-UN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
BIP-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIP-UN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIP-UN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
BIP-UN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIP-UN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

BIP
BIP Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
BIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIP Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
BIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIP Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIP-UN.TO vs. BIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P (BIP-UN.TO) and Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP (BIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BIP-UN.TOBIPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.17

0.91

+0.26

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.62

1.33

+0.29

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.18

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

1.84

+0.42

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.21

4.06

+1.15

BIP-UN.TO vs. BIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIP-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is comparable to the BIP Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIP-UN.TO and BIP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BIP-UN.TOBIPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.17

0.91

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.26

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.52

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.11

0.77

-1.88

Correlation

The correlation between BIP-UN.TO and BIP is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

BIP-UN.TO vs. BIP - Dividend Comparison

BIP-UN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.66%, more than BIP's 4.83% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIP-UN.TO
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P
6.66%7.01%6.74%6.92%6.21%4.61%5.86%6.32%7.93%6.14%6.97%7.97%
BIP
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP
4.83%4.95%5.10%4.86%4.65%3.35%3.92%4.02%5.44%3.88%4.62%5.59%

Drawdowns

BIP-UN.TO vs. BIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIP-UN.TO drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than BIP's maximum drawdown of -46.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIP-UN.TO and BIP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BIP-UN.TOBIPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-100.00%

-56.07%

-43.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.79%

-12.50%

+0.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.43%

-49.85%

+6.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.93%

-51.33%

+4.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.96%

-8.97%

-90.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-99.77%

-10.30%

-89.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.10%

5.29%

-0.19%

Volatility

BIP-UN.TO vs. BIP - Volatility Comparison

Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P (BIP-UN.TO) has a higher volatility of 8.63% compared to Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP (BIP) at 7.99%. This indicates that BIP-UN.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BIP-UN.TOBIPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.63%

7.99%

+0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.43%

13.66%

-0.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.07%

22.33%

-0.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.42%

24.46%

-0.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.35%

26.02%

+0.33%

Financials

BIP-UN.TO vs. BIP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P and Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
6.30B
6.30B
(BIP-UN.TO) Total Revenue
(BIP) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. BIP-UN.TO values in CAD, BIP values in USD

BIP-UN.TO vs. BIP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P and Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%-10.0%0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
28.6%
28.6%
Portfolio components
BIP-UN.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P reported a gross profit of 1.80B and revenue of 6.30B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.6%.

BIP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP reported a gross profit of 1.80B and revenue of 6.30B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.6%.

BIP-UN.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P reported an operating income of 1.69B and revenue of 6.30B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.8%.

BIP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP reported an operating income of 1.69B and revenue of 6.30B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.8%.

BIP-UN.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P reported a net income of 219.00M and revenue of 6.30B, resulting in a net margin of 3.5%.

BIP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP reported a net income of 219.00M and revenue of 6.30B, resulting in a net margin of 3.5%.