BINT vs. SMRF

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

BINT (Bluemonte Global Equity ETF) and SMRF (ALPS Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BINT is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Bluemonte, while SMRF is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by ALPS. Both are actively managed. Their 0.77 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BINT charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for SMRF.

Performance

BINT vs. SMRF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bluemonte Global Equity ETF (BINT) and ALPS Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology ETF (SMRF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BINT

• 1D: 0.72%
• 1M: 0.16%
• 6M: 8.18%
• YTD: 14.01%
• 1Y: 28.06%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 27.03%

SMRF

• 1D: 4.73%
• 1M: -3.83%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BINT Bluemonte Global Equity ETF	$862.27K	$966.71K	$1.78M
SMRF ALPS Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology ETF	$242.56K	$268.44K	$363.09K

BINT vs. SMRF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BINT Bluemonte Global Equity ETF	6.12%
SMRF ALPS Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology ETF	-4.17%

Correlation

The correlation between BINT and SMRF is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2026	0.77

BINT vs. SMRF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BINT	SMRF
Technology	28.7%	23.4%
Financial Services	18.5%	0.1%
Industrials	13.0%	20.6%
Consumer Cyclical	8.2%	-
Healthcare	7.3%	-
Communication Services	5.9%	2.0%
Basic Materials	5.2%	0.3%
Consumer Defensive	4.7%	-
Energy	3.9%	37.8%
Utilities	2.6%	17.3%
Real Estate	2.1%	-

Return for Risk

BINT vs. SMRF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BINT

BINT Risk / Return Rank: 69
BINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
BINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
BINT Omega Ratio Rank: 69
BINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
BINT Martin Ratio Rank: 73

SMRF

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BINT vs. SMRF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Global Equity ETF (BINT) and ALPS Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology ETF (SMRF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BINT	SMRF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.73	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.39	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.58	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.95	—	—

Drawdowns

BINT vs. SMRF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BINT drawdown since its inception was -10.94%, smaller than the maximum SMRF drawdown of -26.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BINT and SMRF.

Drawdown Indicators

	BINT	SMRF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.94%	-26.22%	+15.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.94%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.42%	-17.77%	+15.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.65%	-8.67%	+7.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.83%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BINT	SMRF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.24%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.39%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.32%	46.48%	-30.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.83%	46.48%	-30.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.83%	46.48%	-30.65%

BINT vs. SMRF - Expense Ratio Comparison

BINT has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than SMRF's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

BINT vs. SMRF - Dividend Comparison

BINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, more than SMRF's 0.58% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
BINT Bluemonte Global Equity ETF	1.75%	1.08%
SMRF ALPS Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology ETF	0.58%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BINT and SMRF in my portfolio?

BINT and SMRF have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BINT or SMRF?

On fees, BINT is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BINT or SMRF?

BINT is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SMRF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BINT or SMRF?

BINT has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 0.58% for SMRF.

What is the main difference between BINT and SMRF?

BINT is categorized as Global Equities, while SMRF is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Bluemonte and ALPS. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for BINT and 0.65% for SMRF.