PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMRF vs. TACN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMRF vs. TACN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ALPS Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology ETF (SMRF) and T. Rowe Price Active Core International Equity ETF (TACN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SMRF

1D
1.90%
1M
-0.53%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TACN

1D
0.39%
1M
2.67%
6M
8.65%
YTD
10.93%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMRF vs. TACN - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SMRF and TACN is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2026

0.63

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMRF vs. TACN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology ETF (SMRF) and T. Rowe Price Active Core International Equity ETF (TACN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SMRF vs. TACN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SMRF vs. TACN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMRF drawdown since its inception was -17.20%, which is greater than TACN's maximum drawdown of -10.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMRF and TACN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMRFTACNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.20%

-10.98%

-6.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.19%

-1.18%

-13.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.73%

-2.42%

-4.31%

Volatility

SMRF vs. TACN - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMRFTACNDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.61%

17.59%

+27.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.61%

17.59%

+27.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.61%

17.59%

+27.02%

SMRF vs. TACN - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMRF has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than TACN's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMRF vs. TACN - Dividend Comparison

SMRF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%, while TACN has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


SMRF and TACN have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TACN is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TACN is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SMRF.

SMRF has the higher dividend yield at 0.30%, compared with 0.00% for TACN.

They also come from different issuers: ALPS and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for SMRF and 0.20% for TACN.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMRF and TACN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer