SMRF vs. SAPH

Last updated Jul 30, 2026

SMRF (ALPS Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology ETF) and SAPH (ADRhedged SAP ETF) are both Actively Managed funds. Both are actively managed. Their -0.26 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. SMRF charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for SAPH.

Performance

SMRF vs. SAPH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ALPS Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology ETF (SMRF) and ADRhedged SAP ETF (SAPH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SMRF

• 1D: -4.20%
• 1M: -17.77%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

SAPH

• 1D: 3.32%
• 1M: 19.22%
• 6M: -15.81%
• YTD: -19.27%
• 1Y: -32.30%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -20.71%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
SAPH ADRhedged SAP ETF	$30.61K	$28.06K	$22.54K
SMRF ALPS Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology ETF	$245.14K	$273.89K	$363.96K

SMRF vs. SAPH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
SMRF ALPS Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology ETF	-14.01%
SAPH ADRhedged SAP ETF	-4.41%

Correlation

The correlation between SMRF and SAPH is -0.26, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2026	-0.26

Return for Risk

SMRF vs. SAPH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SMRF

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SAPH

SAPH Risk / Return Rank: 3
SAPH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
SAPH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
SAPH Omega Ratio Rank: 2
SAPH Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
SAPH Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SMRF vs. SAPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology ETF (SMRF) and ADRhedged SAP ETF (SAPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SMRF	SAPH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	-0.87	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	-1.15	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	0.85	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	-0.69	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	-1.11	—

Drawdowns

SMRF vs. SAPH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMRF drawdown since its inception was -26.22%, smaller than the maximum SAPH drawdown of -51.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMRF and SAPH.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMRF	SAPH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.22%	-51.72%	+25.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-47.17%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.22%	-39.47%	+13.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.36%	-23.11%	+14.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	29.05%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SMRF	SAPH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	15.24%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	33.67%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	45.15%	37.36%	+7.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	45.15%	35.48%	+9.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	45.15%	35.48%	+9.67%

SMRF vs. SAPH - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMRF has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than SAPH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

SMRF vs. SAPH - Dividend Comparison

SMRF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than SAPH's 3.46% yield.

Position	TTM
SAPH ADRhedged SAP ETF	3.46%
SMRF ALPS Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology ETF	0.65%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SMRF and SAPH in my portfolio?

SMRF and SAPH have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SMRF or SAPH?

On fees, SAPH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SMRF or SAPH?

SAPH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SMRF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SMRF or SAPH?

SAPH has the higher dividend yield at 3.46%, compared with 0.65% for SMRF.

What is the main difference between SMRF and SAPH?

They also come from different issuers: ALPS and ADRhedged. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for SMRF and 0.19% for SAPH.