PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BINT vs. NXTE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BINT vs. NXTE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bluemonte Global Equity ETF (BINT) and Axs Green Alpha ETF (NXTE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BINT achieves a 15.75% return, which is significantly lower than NXTE's 35.18% return.


BINT

1D
0.01%
1M
4.42%
YTD
15.75%
6M
17.63%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NXTE

1D
-0.69%
1M
14.44%
YTD
35.18%
6M
33.52%
1Y
62.19%
3Y*
18.45%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BINT vs. NXTE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BINT
Bluemonte Global Equity ETF
15.75%13.85%
NXTE
Axs Green Alpha ETF
35.18%15.81%

Correlation

The correlation between BINT and NXTE is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025

0.83

BINT vs. NXTE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BINT
NXTE

Technology

24.4%
48.5%

Financial Services

18.8%
1.5%

Industrials

13.7%
17.6%

Consumer Cyclical

8.9%
4.1%

Healthcare

7.5%
11.3%

Communication Services

6.4%
1.9%

Basic Materials

5.7%
0.5%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
2.1%

Energy

4.6%

-

Utilities

2.8%
2.2%

Real Estate

2.2%
10.9%

Technology

BINT
24.4%
NXTE
48.5%

Financial Services

BINT
18.8%
NXTE
1.5%

Industrials

BINT
13.7%
NXTE
17.6%

Consumer Cyclical

BINT
8.9%
NXTE
4.1%

Healthcare

BINT
7.5%
NXTE
11.3%

Communication Services

BINT
6.4%
NXTE
1.9%

Basic Materials

BINT
5.7%
NXTE
0.5%

Consumer Defensive

BINT
5.0%
NXTE
2.1%

Energy

BINT
4.6%
NXTE

-

Utilities

BINT
2.8%
NXTE
2.2%

Real Estate

BINT
2.2%
NXTE
10.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BINT vs. NXTE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BINT

NXTE
NXTE Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
NXTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NXTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
NXTE Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
NXTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
NXTE Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BINT vs. NXTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Global Equity ETF (BINT) and Axs Green Alpha ETF (NXTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BINT vs. NXTE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BINTNXTEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.31

0.66

+1.65

Drawdowns

BINT vs. NXTE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BINT drawdown since its inception was -10.94%, smaller than the maximum NXTE drawdown of -28.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BINT and NXTE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BINTNXTEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.94%

-28.64%

+17.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.93%

-1.30%

+0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.46%

-7.87%

+6.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.26%

Volatility

BINT vs. NXTE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BINTNXTEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.66%

24.52%

-9.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.66%

25.98%

-11.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.66%

25.98%

-11.32%

BINT vs. NXTE - Expense Ratio Comparison

BINT has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than NXTE's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

BINT vs. NXTE - Dividend Comparison

BINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, more than NXTE's 0.37% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BINT
Bluemonte Global Equity ETF
0.99%1.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NXTE
Axs Green Alpha ETF
0.37%0.36%0.52%0.76%0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


BINT and NXTE have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BINT is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BINT is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for NXTE.

BINT has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.37% for NXTE.

They also come from different issuers: Bluemonte and AXS. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for BINT and 1.00% for NXTE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BINT and NXTE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer