BINT vs. BDVL

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

BINT (Bluemonte Global Equity ETF) and BDVL (iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF) are both Global Equities funds. BINT is actively managed, while BDVL is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.83 means they have usually moved in the same direction. BINT charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for BDVL.

Performance

BINT vs. BDVL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bluemonte Global Equity ETF (BINT) and iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF (BDVL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BINT achieves a 14.01% return, which is significantly higher than BDVL's 7.22% return.

BINT

• 1D: 0.72%
• 1M: 0.16%
• 6M: 8.18%
• YTD: 14.01%
• 1Y: 28.06%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 27.03%

BDVL

• 1D: 0.49%
• 1M: 1.15%
• 6M: 4.87%
• YTD: 7.22%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BDVL iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF	$5.36M	$5.75M	$7.18M
BINT Bluemonte Global Equity ETF	$862.27K	$966.71K	$1.78M

BINT vs. BDVL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BINT Bluemonte Global Equity ETF	14.01%	5.40%
BDVL iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF	7.22%	2.20%

Correlation

The correlation between BINT and BDVL is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2025	0.83

BINT vs. BDVL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BINT	BDVL
Technology	28.7%	26.2%
Financial Services	18.5%	13.5%
Industrials	13.0%	15.9%
Consumer Cyclical	8.2%	9.2%
Healthcare	7.3%	10.5%
Communication Services	5.9%	8.8%
Basic Materials	5.2%	3.0%
Consumer Defensive	4.7%	5.3%
Energy	3.9%	2.2%
Utilities	2.6%	4.5%
Real Estate	2.1%	1.1%

Return for Risk

BINT vs. BDVL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BINT

BINT Risk / Return Rank: 69
BINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
BINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
BINT Omega Ratio Rank: 69
BINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
BINT Martin Ratio Rank: 73

BDVL

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BINT vs. BDVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Global Equity ETF (BINT) and iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF (BDVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BINT	BDVL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.73	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.39	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.58	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.95	—	—

Drawdowns

BINT vs. BDVL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BINT drawdown since its inception was -10.94%, which is greater than BDVL's maximum drawdown of -7.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BINT and BDVL.

Drawdown Indicators

	BINT	BDVL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.94%	-7.71%	-3.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.94%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.42%	0.00%	-2.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.65%	-1.12%	-0.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.83%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BINT	BDVL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.24%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.39%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.32%	9.43%	+6.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.83%	9.43%	+6.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.83%	9.43%	+6.40%

BINT vs. BDVL - Expense Ratio Comparison

BINT has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than BDVL's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

BINT vs. BDVL - Dividend Comparison

BINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, less than BDVL's 3.47% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
BDVL iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF	3.47%	2.79%
BINT Bluemonte Global Equity ETF	1.75%	1.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BINT and BDVL in my portfolio?

BINT and BDVL have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BINT or BDVL?

On fees, BINT is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BINT or BDVL?

BINT is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for BDVL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BINT or BDVL?

BDVL has the higher dividend yield at 3.47%, compared with 1.75% for BINT.

What is the main difference between BINT and BDVL?

They also come from different issuers: Bluemonte and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for BINT and 0.40% for BDVL.