BINT vs. BDVL
BINT (Bluemonte Global Equity ETF) and BDVL (iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BINT charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for BDVL.
Performance
BINT vs. BDVL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BINT achieves a 15.75% return, which is significantly higher than BDVL's 5.11% return.
BINT
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 4.42%
- YTD
- 15.75%
- 6M
- 17.63%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BDVL
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- YTD
- 5.11%
- 6M
- 5.65%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BINT vs. BDVL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BINT Bluemonte Global Equity ETF | 15.75% | 4.61% |
BDVL iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF | 5.11% | 1.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between BINT and BDVL is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2025 | 0.83 |
BINT vs. BDVL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BINT
BDVL
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
BINT
BDVL
Financial Services
BINT
BDVL
Industrials
BINT
BDVL
Consumer Cyclical
BINT
BDVL
Healthcare
BINT
BDVL
Communication Services
BINT
BDVL
Basic Materials
BINT
BDVL
Consumer Defensive
BINT
BDVL
Energy
BINT
BDVL
Utilities
BINT
BDVL
Real Estate
BINT
BDVL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BINT vs. BDVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Global Equity ETF (BINT) and iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF (BDVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BINT | BDVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.31 | 1.07 | +1.24 |
Drawdowns
BINT vs. BDVL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BINT drawdown since its inception was -10.94%, which is greater than BDVL's maximum drawdown of -7.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BINT and BDVL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BINT | BDVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.94% | -7.71% | -3.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.93% | -0.57% | -0.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.46% | -1.19% | -0.27% |
Volatility
BINT vs. BDVL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BINT | BDVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.66% | 9.47% | +5.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.66% | 9.47% | +5.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.66% | 9.47% | +5.19% |
BINT vs. BDVL - Expense Ratio Comparison
BINT has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than BDVL's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
BINT vs. BDVL - Dividend Comparison
BINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than BDVL's 2.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BDVL iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF | 2.65% | 2.79% |
BINT Bluemonte Global Equity ETF | 0.99% | 1.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BINT and BDVL have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BINT is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BINT is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for BDVL.
BDVL has the higher dividend yield at 2.65%, compared with 0.99% for BINT.
They also come from different issuers: Bluemonte and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for BINT and 0.40% for BDVL.
Find the right allocation for BINT and BDVL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer