PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BINT vs. BDVL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BINT vs. BDVL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bluemonte Global Equity ETF (BINT) and iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF (BDVL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BINT achieves a 15.75% return, which is significantly higher than BDVL's 5.11% return.


BINT

1D
0.01%
1M
4.42%
YTD
15.75%
6M
17.63%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BDVL

1D
0.38%
1M
0.49%
YTD
5.11%
6M
5.65%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BINT vs. BDVL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BINT and BDVL is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2025

0.83

BINT vs. BDVL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BINT
BDVL

Technology

24.4%
23.0%

Financial Services

18.8%
13.9%

Industrials

13.7%
15.4%

Consumer Cyclical

8.9%
8.5%

Healthcare

7.5%
11.1%

Communication Services

6.4%
10.7%

Basic Materials

5.7%
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
6.3%

Energy

4.6%
2.8%

Utilities

2.8%
4.8%

Real Estate

2.2%
1.0%

Technology

BINT
24.4%
BDVL
23.0%

Financial Services

BINT
18.8%
BDVL
13.9%

Industrials

BINT
13.7%
BDVL
15.4%

Consumer Cyclical

BINT
8.9%
BDVL
8.5%

Healthcare

BINT
7.5%
BDVL
11.1%

Communication Services

BINT
6.4%
BDVL
10.7%

Basic Materials

BINT
5.7%
BDVL
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

BINT
5.0%
BDVL
6.3%

Energy

BINT
4.6%
BDVL
2.8%

Utilities

BINT
2.8%
BDVL
4.8%

Real Estate

BINT
2.2%
BDVL
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BINT vs. BDVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Global Equity ETF (BINT) and iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF (BDVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BINT vs. BDVL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BINTBDVLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.31

1.07

+1.24

Drawdowns

BINT vs. BDVL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BINT drawdown since its inception was -10.94%, which is greater than BDVL's maximum drawdown of -7.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BINT and BDVL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BINTBDVLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.94%

-7.71%

-3.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.93%

-0.57%

-0.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.46%

-1.19%

-0.27%

Volatility

BINT vs. BDVL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BINTBDVLDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.66%

9.47%

+5.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.66%

9.47%

+5.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.66%

9.47%

+5.19%

BINT vs. BDVL - Expense Ratio Comparison

BINT has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than BDVL's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

BINT vs. BDVL - Dividend Comparison

BINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than BDVL's 2.65% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


BINT and BDVL have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BINT is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BINT is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for BDVL.

BDVL has the higher dividend yield at 2.65%, compared with 0.99% for BINT.

They also come from different issuers: Bluemonte and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for BINT and 0.40% for BDVL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BINT and BDVL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer