BIMSX vs. BMNSX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

BIMSX (Baird Intermediate Bond Fund) and BMNSX (Baird Core Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund) are both mutual funds - BIMSX is a Intermediate Core Bond fund managed by Baird, while BMNSX is a Municipal Bonds fund managed by Baird. Over the past 10 years, BIMSX returned 1.95%/yr vs 2.27%/yr for BMNSX. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.55% expense ratio.

Performance

BIMSX vs. BMNSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baird Intermediate Bond Fund (BIMSX) and Baird Core Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund (BMNSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIMSX achieves a -0.01% return, which is significantly lower than BMNSX's 1.26% return. Over the past 10 years, BIMSX has underperformed BMNSX with an annualized return of 1.95%, while BMNSX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.27% annualized return.

BIMSX

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: -0.05%
• YTD: -0.01%
• 6M: 0.26%
• 1Y: 3.53%
• 3Y*: 4.46%
• 5Y*: 1.03%
• 10Y*: 1.95%

BMNSX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.49%
• YTD: 1.26%
• 6M: 1.65%
• 1Y: 5.77%
• 3Y*: 3.97%
• 5Y*: 1.44%
• 10Y*: 2.27%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIMSX vs. BMNSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BIMSX Baird Intermediate Bond Fund	-0.01%	6.76%	3.21%	5.53%	-8.88%	-1.68%	7.16%	6.83%	0.30%	2.53%
BMNSX Baird Core Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund	1.26%	4.63%	2.26%	5.28%	-6.40%	1.44%	5.02%	6.40%	1.05%	5.00%

Correlation

The correlation between BIMSX and BMNSX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.56
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.51
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2015	0.49

The correlation between BIMSX and BMNSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BIMSX vs. BMNSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIMSX

BIMSX Risk / Return Rank: 30
BIMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
BIMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
BIMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 31
BIMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
BIMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 27

BMNSX

BMNSX Risk / Return Rank: 79
BMNSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
BMNSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
BMNSX Omega Ratio Rank: 97
BMNSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
BMNSX Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIMSX vs. BMNSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baird Intermediate Bond Fund (BIMSX) and Baird Core Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund (BMNSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BIMSX	BMNSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.55	3.52	-1.97
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.35	5.36	-3.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.96	-0.67
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.10	2.82	-0.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.48	9.87	-3.40
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BIMSX vs. BMNSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIMSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is lower than the BMNSX Sharpe Ratio of 3.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIMSX and BMNSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BIMSX	BMNSX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.55	3.52	-1.97
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.27	0.54	-0.27
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.60	0.76	-0.15
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.09	0.87	+0.22

Drawdowns

BIMSX vs. BMNSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIMSX drawdown since its inception was -13.07%, which is greater than BMNSX's maximum drawdown of -10.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIMSX and BMNSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BIMSX	BMNSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.07%	-10.24%	-2.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.87%	-2.09%	+0.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-2.57%	-3.67%	+1.10%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.00%	-10.24%	-2.76%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-13.07%	-10.24%	-2.83%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.16%	-0.50%	-0.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.59%	-1.65%	+0.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.60%	0.60%	0.00%

Volatility

BIMSX vs. BMNSX - Volatility Comparison

Baird Intermediate Bond Fund (BIMSX) has a higher volatility of 0.85% compared to Baird Core Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund (BMNSX) at 0.63%. This indicates that BIMSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BMNSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BIMSX	BMNSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.85%	0.63%	+0.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.79%	1.34%	+0.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.54%	1.67%	+0.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.88%	2.69%	+1.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.24%	3.01%	+0.23%

BIMSX vs. BMNSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BIMSX and BMNSX have an expense ratio of 0.55%.

Dividends

BIMSX vs. BMNSX - Dividend Comparison

BIMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%, more than BMNSX's 3.25% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BIMSX Baird Intermediate Bond Fund	3.60%	3.50%	3.44%	2.81%	1.81%	1.90%	3.08%	2.16%	2.14%	1.98%	1.89%	2.21%
BMNSX Baird Core Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund	3.25%	3.22%	3.12%	2.74%	1.67%	1.34%	1.99%	2.15%	2.01%	1.71%	1.39%	0.59%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BIMSX and BMNSX in my portfolio?

BIMSX and BMNSX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BIMSX or BMNSX?

BIMSX has higher volatility (0.85%) compared to BMNSX (0.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIMSX dropped -13.07% vs BMNSX's -10.24%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BMNSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.52 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.