PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BMNSX vs. BCOSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BMNSX vs. BCOSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baird Core Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund (BMNSX) and Baird Core Plus Bond Fund (BCOSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BMNSX achieves a 1.26% return, which is significantly higher than BCOSX's 0.41% return. Over the past 10 years, BMNSX has outperformed BCOSX with an annualized return of 2.27%, while BCOSX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.15% annualized return.


BMNSX

1D
0.10%
1M
0.49%
YTD
1.26%
6M
1.65%
1Y
5.87%
3Y*
3.97%
5Y*
1.46%
10Y*
2.27%

BCOSX

1D
0.09%
1M
0.52%
YTD
0.41%
6M
0.42%
1Y
5.39%
3Y*
4.66%
5Y*
0.58%
10Y*
2.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BMNSX vs. BCOSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BMNSX
Baird Core Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund
1.26%4.63%2.26%5.28%-6.40%1.44%5.02%6.40%1.05%5.00%
BCOSX
Baird Core Plus Bond Fund
0.41%7.22%2.26%6.60%-13.09%-1.23%8.59%9.69%-0.74%4.47%

Correlation

The correlation between BMNSX and BCOSX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2015

0.51

The correlation between BMNSX and BCOSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BMNSX vs. BCOSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BMNSX
BMNSX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
BMNSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BMNSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
BMNSX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
BMNSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
BMNSX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

BCOSX
BCOSX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
BCOSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCOSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCOSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
BCOSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCOSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BMNSX vs. BCOSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baird Core Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund (BMNSX) and Baird Core Plus Bond Fund (BCOSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BMNSXBCOSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.96

1.27

+0.69

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.82

2.10

+0.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.89

6.18

+3.71

BMNSX vs. BCOSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BMNSX Sharpe Ratio is 3.52, which is higher than the BCOSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BMNSX and BCOSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BMNSXBCOSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.52

1.50

+2.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.10

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

0.46

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

1.02

-0.15

Drawdowns

BMNSX vs. BCOSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMNSX drawdown since its inception was -10.24%, smaller than the maximum BCOSX drawdown of -18.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMNSX and BCOSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BMNSXBCOSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.24%

-18.39%

+8.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.09%

-2.58%

+0.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.67%

-5.80%

+2.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.24%

-18.39%

+8.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-10.24%

-18.39%

+8.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.50%

-1.24%

+0.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.65%

-2.30%

+0.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.59%

0.87%

-0.28%

Volatility

BMNSX vs. BCOSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Baird Core Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund (BMNSX) is 0.63%, while Baird Core Plus Bond Fund (BCOSX) has a volatility of 1.23%. This indicates that BMNSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BCOSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BMNSXBCOSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.63%

1.23%

-0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.34%

2.55%

-1.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.68%

3.62%

-1.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.69%

5.62%

-2.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.01%

4.65%

-1.64%

BMNSX vs. BCOSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BMNSX and BCOSX have an expense ratio of 0.55%.


Dividends

BMNSX vs. BCOSX - Dividend Comparison

BMNSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%, less than BCOSX's 3.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BCOSX
Baird Core Plus Bond Fund
3.87%3.75%3.68%3.17%2.69%2.57%3.11%2.60%2.75%2.47%2.27%2.49%
BMNSX
Baird Core Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund
3.25%3.22%3.12%2.74%1.67%1.34%1.99%2.15%2.01%1.71%1.39%0.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


BMNSX and BCOSX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BCOSX has higher volatility (1.23%) compared to BMNSX (0.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BMNSX dropped -10.24% vs BCOSX's -18.39%.

BMNSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.52 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BMNSX and BCOSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer