BMNSX vs. BIMIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Baird Core Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund (BMNSX) and Baird Intermediate Bond Fund Class Institutional (BIMIX).
BMNSX is managed by Baird. It was launched on Aug 30, 2015. BIMIX is managed by Baird. It was launched on Sep 29, 2000.
Performance
BMNSX vs. BIMIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BMNSX vs. BIMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMNSX Baird Core Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund | 0.03% | 4.63% | 2.26% | 5.28% | -6.40% | 1.44% | 5.02% | 6.40% | 1.05% | 5.00% |
BIMIX Baird Intermediate Bond Fund Class Institutional | -0.34% | 6.69% | 3.45% | 5.78% | -8.64% | -1.41% | 7.42% | 7.05% | 0.58% | 2.74% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BMNSX achieves a 0.03% return, which is significantly higher than BIMIX's -0.34% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BMNSX having a 2.25% annualized return and BIMIX not far behind at 2.23%.
BMNSX
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -1.52%
- YTD
- 0.03%
- 6M
- 1.45%
- 1Y
- 4.10%
- 3Y*
- 3.37%
- 5Y*
- 1.40%
- 10Y*
- 2.25%
BIMIX
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -1.23%
- YTD
- -0.34%
- 6M
- 0.62%
- 1Y
- 4.02%
- 3Y*
- 4.36%
- 5Y*
- 1.30%
- 10Y*
- 2.23%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BMNSX vs. BIMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BMNSX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than BIMIX's 0.30% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BMNSX vs. BIMIX — Risk / Return Rank
BMNSX
BIMIX
BMNSX vs. BIMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baird Core Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund (BMNSX) and Baird Intermediate Bond Fund Class Institutional (BIMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BMNSX | BIMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.46 | 1.48 | -0.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.92 | 2.18 | -0.26 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.28 | +0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.48 | 2.04 | -0.56 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.01 | 8.17 | -2.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BMNSX | BIMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.46 | 1.48 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.34 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | 0.69 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 1.17 | -0.33 |
Correlation
The correlation between BMNSX and BIMIX is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
BMNSX vs. BIMIX - Dividend Comparison
BMNSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%, less than BIMIX's 3.67% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMNSX Baird Core Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund | 3.23% | 3.22% | 3.12% | 2.74% | 1.67% | 1.34% | 1.99% | 2.15% | 2.01% | 1.71% | 1.39% | 0.59% |
BIMIX Baird Intermediate Bond Fund Class Institutional | 3.67% | 3.67% | 3.89% | 3.21% | 2.17% | 2.27% | 3.49% | 2.52% | 2.50% | 2.35% | 2.21% | 2.57% |
Drawdowns
BMNSX vs. BIMIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BMNSX drawdown since its inception was -10.24%, smaller than the maximum BIMIX drawdown of -12.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMNSX and BIMIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BMNSX | BIMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.24% | -12.76% | +2.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.11% | -2.07% | -1.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.24% | -12.76% | +2.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -10.24% | -12.76% | +2.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.71% | -1.60% | -0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.67% | -1.49% | -0.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.77% | 0.52% | +0.25% |
Volatility
BMNSX vs. BIMIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Baird Core Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund (BMNSX) is 0.83%, while Baird Intermediate Bond Fund Class Institutional (BIMIX) has a volatility of 1.05%. This indicates that BMNSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BIMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BMNSX | BIMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.83% | 1.05% | -0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.15% | 1.65% | -0.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.03% | 2.79% | +0.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.67% | 3.87% | -1.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.00% | 3.25% | -0.25% |