PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BIMPX vs. VTMFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BIMPX vs. VTMFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock 40/60 Target Allocation Fund (BIMPX) and Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares (VTMFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIMPX achieves a 7.15% return, which is significantly higher than VTMFX's 6.03% return. Over the past 10 years, BIMPX has underperformed VTMFX with an annualized return of 6.87%, while VTMFX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.70% annualized return.


BIMPX

1D
0.27%
1M
3.82%
YTD
7.15%
6M
7.40%
1Y
17.31%
3Y*
10.65%
5Y*
4.81%
10Y*
6.87%

VTMFX

1D
0.17%
1M
3.06%
YTD
6.03%
6M
6.16%
1Y
16.91%
3Y*
12.75%
5Y*
7.33%
10Y*
8.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIMPX vs. VTMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BIMPX
BlackRock 40/60 Target Allocation Fund
7.15%13.43%4.93%12.41%-14.84%3.51%19.76%16.65%-3.77%11.77%
VTMFX
Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares
6.03%11.28%12.17%15.55%-12.69%13.10%13.31%18.01%-1.40%12.61%

Correlation

The correlation between BIMPX and VTMFX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2006

0.91

The correlation between BIMPX and VTMFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BIMPX vs. VTMFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIMPX
BIMPX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
BIMPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIMPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIMPX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
BIMPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIMPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

VTMFX
VTMFX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
VTMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
VTMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIMPX vs. VTMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock 40/60 Target Allocation Fund (BIMPX) and Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares (VTMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BIMPXVTMFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.55

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

3.22

-0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.47

15.40

-1.93

BIMPX vs. VTMFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIMPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is comparable to the VTMFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIMPX and VTMFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BIMPXVTMFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.52

2.83

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.86

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.96

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.85

-0.25

Drawdowns

BIMPX vs. VTMFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIMPX drawdown since its inception was -39.37%, which is greater than VTMFX's maximum drawdown of -28.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIMPX and VTMFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BIMPXVTMFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.37%

-28.49%

-10.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.74%

-5.38%

-0.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.11%

-10.61%

-0.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.85%

-17.40%

-2.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.85%

-21.87%

+2.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.78%

-3.55%

-1.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.30%

1.12%

+0.18%

Volatility

BIMPX vs. VTMFX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock 40/60 Target Allocation Fund (BIMPX) has a higher volatility of 2.70% compared to Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares (VTMFX) at 1.70%. This indicates that BIMPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTMFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BIMPXVTMFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.70%

1.70%

+1.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.94%

4.75%

+1.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.99%

6.13%

+0.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.19%

8.52%

+0.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.57%

9.12%

-0.55%

BIMPX vs. VTMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIMPX has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is higher than VTMFX's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BIMPX vs. VTMFX - Dividend Comparison

BIMPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.30%, more than VTMFX's 2.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIMPX
BlackRock 40/60 Target Allocation Fund
5.30%5.68%0.00%2.96%3.06%6.35%4.34%2.66%7.95%2.50%1.83%9.76%
VTMFX
Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares
2.10%2.14%2.08%1.94%1.85%1.38%1.72%2.05%2.22%2.00%2.13%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, BIMPX and VTMFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BIMPX has higher volatility (2.70%) compared to VTMFX (1.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIMPX dropped -39.37% vs VTMFX's -28.49%.

VTMFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs 2.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BIMPX and VTMFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer