VTMFX vs. USBLX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

VTMFX (Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares) and USBLX (USAA Growth and Tax Strategy Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, VTMFX returned 8.63%/yr vs 8.23%/yr for USBLX. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. VTMFX charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for USBLX.

Performance

VTMFX vs. USBLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares (VTMFX) and USAA Growth and Tax Strategy Fund (USBLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTMFX achieves a 5.44% return, which is significantly lower than USBLX's 6.39% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VTMFX having a 8.63% annualized return and USBLX not far behind at 8.23%.

VTMFX

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: 0.96%
• YTD: 5.44%
• 6M: 5.27%
• 1Y: 15.82%
• 3Y*: 11.93%
• 5Y*: 7.23%
• 10Y*: 8.63%

USBLX

• 1D: 0.60%
• 1M: 1.33%
• YTD: 6.39%
• 6M: 6.22%
• 1Y: 16.95%
• 3Y*: 12.32%
• 5Y*: 6.89%
• 10Y*: 8.23%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTMFX vs. USBLX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VTMFX Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares	5.44%	11.28%	12.17%	15.55%	-12.69%	13.10%	13.31%	18.01%	-1.40%	12.61%
USBLX USAA Growth and Tax Strategy Fund	6.39%	10.30%	13.32%	16.10%	-15.82%	14.80%	10.78%	18.46%	-1.95%	13.48%

Correlation

The correlation between VTMFX and USBLX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.98
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 1994	0.95

The correlation between VTMFX and USBLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

VTMFX vs. USBLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTMFX

VTMFX Risk / Return Rank: 76
VTMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
VTMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
VTMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
VTMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
VTMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 79

USBLX

USBLX Risk / Return Rank: 83
USBLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
USBLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
USBLX Omega Ratio Rank: 82
USBLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
USBLX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTMFX vs. USBLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares (VTMFX) and USAA Growth and Tax Strategy Fund (USBLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VTMFX	USBLX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.45	2.59	-0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.45	3.68	-0.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.49	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.93	3.22	-0.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.72	15.48	-1.76

VTMFX vs. USBLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTMFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is comparable to the USBLX Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTMFX and USBLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VTMFX vs. USBLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTMFX drawdown since its inception was -28.49%, smaller than the maximum USBLX drawdown of -33.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTMFX and USBLX.

Drawdown Indicators

	VTMFX	USBLX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.49%	-33.49%	+5.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.38%	-5.24%	-0.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.61%	-11.66%	+1.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.40%	-20.51%	+3.11%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-21.87%	-21.93%	+0.06%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.56%	-0.29%	-0.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.54%	-4.29%	+0.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.15%	1.09%	+0.06%

Volatility

VTMFX vs. USBLX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares (VTMFX) and USAA Growth and Tax Strategy Fund (USBLX) have volatilities of 2.50% and 2.40%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VTMFX	USBLX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.50%	2.40%	+0.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.21%	5.26%	-0.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.45%	6.50%	-0.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.57%	8.69%	-0.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.15%	9.11%	+0.04%

VTMFX vs. USBLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTMFX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than USBLX's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

VTMFX vs. USBLX - Dividend Comparison

VTMFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, less than USBLX's 2.24% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
USBLX USAA Growth and Tax Strategy Fund	2.24%	1.96%	2.28%	2.11%	1.74%	1.66%	1.88%	1.95%	2.73%	2.16%	2.31%	2.69%
VTMFX Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares	2.12%	2.14%	2.08%	1.94%	1.85%	1.38%	1.72%	2.05%	2.22%	2.00%	2.13%	2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VTMFX and USBLX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.98, VTMFX and USBLX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, VTMFX or USBLX?

VTMFX has higher volatility (2.50%) compared to USBLX (2.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTMFX dropped -28.49% vs USBLX's -33.49%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

USBLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 2.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.