BHF vs. BRBS
BHF (Brighthouse Financial, Inc.) and BRBS (Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — BHF in Insurance - Life, BRBS in Banks - Regional. Over the past 5 years, BHF returned 7.33%/yr vs -23.30%/yr for BRBS. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BHF vs. BRBS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BHF achieves a -2.69% return, which is significantly higher than BRBS's -7.03% return.
BHF
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 0.93%
- YTD
- -2.69%
- 6M
- -2.79%
- 1Y
- 7.12%
- 3Y*
- 12.65%
- 5Y*
- 7.33%
- 10Y*
- —
BRBS
- 1D
- 1.49%
- 1M
- 3.66%
- YTD
- -7.03%
- 6M
- -9.78%
- 1Y
- 27.52%
- 3Y*
- -22.63%
- 5Y*
- -23.30%
- 10Y*
- -4.38%
BHF vs. BRBS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BHF Brighthouse Financial, Inc. | -2.69% | 34.87% | -9.22% | 3.22% | -1.02% | 43.07% | -7.71% | 28.71% | -48.02% | -21.81% |
BRBS Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc. | -7.03% | 40.14% | 6.27% | -75.19% | -27.87% | 55.01% | -12.56% | 24.18% | 4.45% | 17.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between BHF and BRBS is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2017 | 0.23 |
The correlation between BHF and BRBS shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.34 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BHF:
-$1.50
BRBS:
$0.12
BHF:
0.49
BRBS:
2.92
BHF:
$5.58B
BRBS:
$112.19M
BHF:
$2.23B
BRBS:
$73.64M
BHF:
$942.00M
BRBS:
$15.28M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BHF vs. BRBS — Risk / Return Rank
BHF
BRBS
BHF vs. BRBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brighthouse Financial, Inc. (BHF) and Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc. (BRBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BHF | BRBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.19 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.27 | 1.56 | -1.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.62 | 3.15 | -2.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BHF vs. BRBS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BHF drawdown since its inception was -78.47%, smaller than the maximum BRBS drawdown of -88.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BHF and BRBS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BHF | BRBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.47% | -88.26% | +9.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.37% | -17.76% | -8.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.14% | -77.38% | +46.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.19% | -88.26% | +53.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -88.26% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.93% | -76.43% | +60.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.34% | -50.86% | +13.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.54% | 8.77% | +2.77% |
Volatility
BHF vs. BRBS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Brighthouse Financial, Inc. (BHF) is 1.66%, while Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc. (BRBS) has a volatility of 3.84%. This indicates that BHF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BRBS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BHF | BRBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.66% | 3.84% | -2.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.11% | 17.09% | -9.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.84% | 28.86% | +24.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.25% | 46.31% | -3.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.74% | 41.83% | +6.91% |
Dividends
BHF vs. BRBS - Dividend Comparison
BHF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BRBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.00%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BHF Brighthouse Financial, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BRBS Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc. | 25.00% | 5.85% | 0.00% | 8.09% | 3.90% | 2.43% | 2.40% | 2.04% | 3.13% | 1.88% | 2.07% | 2.83% |
Financials
BHF vs. BRBS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brighthouse Financial, Inc. and Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
BHF and BRBS have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BRBS has higher volatility (3.84%) compared to BHF (1.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BHF dropped -78.47% vs BRBS's -88.26%.
BRBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.96 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BHF and BRBS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer