PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BHF vs. BRBS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BHF vs. BRBS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brighthouse Financial, Inc. (BHF) and Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc. (BRBS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BHF achieves a -2.69% return, which is significantly higher than BRBS's -7.03% return.


BHF

1D
-0.32%
1M
0.93%
YTD
-2.69%
6M
-2.79%
1Y
7.12%
3Y*
12.65%
5Y*
7.33%
10Y*

BRBS

1D
1.49%
1M
3.66%
YTD
-7.03%
6M
-9.78%
1Y
27.52%
3Y*
-22.63%
5Y*
-23.30%
10Y*
-4.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BHF vs. BRBS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BHF
Brighthouse Financial, Inc.
-2.69%34.87%-9.22%3.22%-1.02%43.07%-7.71%28.71%-48.02%-21.81%
BRBS
Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc.
-7.03%40.14%6.27%-75.19%-27.87%55.01%-12.56%24.18%4.45%17.10%

Correlation

The correlation between BHF and BRBS is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2017

0.23

The correlation between BHF and BRBS shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.34 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

BHF:

-$1.50

BRBS:

$0.12

PS Ratio

BHF:

0.49

BRBS:

2.92

Total Revenue (TTM)

BHF:

$5.58B

BRBS:

$112.19M

Gross Profit (TTM)

BHF:

$2.23B

BRBS:

$73.64M

EBITDA (TTM)

BHF:

$942.00M

BRBS:

$15.28M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BHF vs. BRBS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BHF
BHF Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
BHF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BHF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
BHF Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
BHF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
BHF Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

BRBS
BRBS Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
BRBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRBS Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
BRBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRBS Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BHF vs. BRBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brighthouse Financial, Inc. (BHF) and Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc. (BRBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BHFBRBSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.19

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.27

1.56

-1.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.62

3.15

-2.53

BHF vs. BRBS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BHF Sharpe Ratio is 0.13, which is lower than the BRBS Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BHF and BRBS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BHF vs. BRBS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BHF drawdown since its inception was -78.47%, smaller than the maximum BRBS drawdown of -88.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BHF and BRBS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BHFBRBSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.47%

-88.26%

+9.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.37%

-17.76%

-8.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.14%

-77.38%

+46.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.19%

-88.26%

+53.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-88.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.93%

-76.43%

+60.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.34%

-50.86%

+13.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.54%

8.77%

+2.77%

Volatility

BHF vs. BRBS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brighthouse Financial, Inc. (BHF) is 1.66%, while Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc. (BRBS) has a volatility of 3.84%. This indicates that BHF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BRBS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BHFBRBSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.66%

3.84%

-2.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.11%

17.09%

-9.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

53.84%

28.86%

+24.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.25%

46.31%

-3.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.74%

41.83%

+6.91%

Dividends

BHF vs. BRBS - Dividend Comparison

BHF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BRBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.00%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BHF
Brighthouse Financial, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BRBS
Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc.
25.00%5.85%0.00%8.09%3.90%2.43%2.40%2.04%3.13%1.88%2.07%2.83%

Financials

BHF vs. BRBS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brighthouse Financial, Inc. and Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20222023202420252026
1.53B
0
(BHF) Total Revenue
(BRBS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


BHF and BRBS have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BRBS has higher volatility (3.84%) compared to BHF (1.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BHF dropped -78.47% vs BRBS's -88.26%.

BRBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.96 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BHF and BRBS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer