BRBS vs. 100D.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc. (BRBS) and Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (100D.L).
100D.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the FTSE AllSh TR GBP. It was launched on Sep 24, 2021.
Performance
BRBS vs. 100D.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BRBS vs. 100D.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRBS Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc. | -1.64% | 40.14% | 6.27% | -75.19% | -27.87% | 55.01% | -12.56% | 19.01% |
100D.L Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF | 4.14% | 35.26% | 7.50% | 13.03% | -6.40% | 16.93% | -9.08% | 5.82% |
Different Trading Currencies
BRBS is traded in USD, while 100D.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the 100D.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BRBS achieves a -1.64% return, which is significantly lower than 100D.L's 4.14% return.
BRBS
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 3.70%
- YTD
- -1.64%
- 6M
- 3.95%
- 1Y
- 38.71%
- 3Y*
- -23.91%
- 5Y*
- -20.15%
- 10Y*
- -3.47%
100D.L
- 1D
- 2.39%
- 1M
- -4.03%
- YTD
- 4.14%
- 6M
- 9.84%
- 1Y
- 27.73%
- 3Y*
- 17.57%
- 5Y*
- 11.96%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BRBS vs. 100D.L — Risk / Return Rank
BRBS
100D.L
BRBS vs. 100D.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc. (BRBS) and Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (100D.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BRBS | 100D.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.29 | 1.66 | -0.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.99 | 2.09 | -0.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.33 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.28 | 2.28 | -0.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.83 | 9.88 | -4.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BRBS | 100D.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.29 | 1.66 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.44 | 0.72 | -1.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.08 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.17 | 0.46 | -0.63 |
Correlation
The correlation between BRBS and 100D.L is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
BRBS vs. 100D.L - Dividend Comparison
BRBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.95%, more than 100D.L's 3.59% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRBS Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc. | 5.95% | 5.85% | 0.00% | 8.09% | 3.90% | 2.43% | 2.40% | 2.04% | 3.13% | 1.88% | 2.07% | 2.83% |
100D.L Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF | 3.59% | 3.78% | 4.17% | 3.90% | 3.80% | 3.39% | 3.11% | 4.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
BRBS vs. 100D.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BRBS drawdown since its inception was -88.26%, which is greater than 100D.L's maximum drawdown of -42.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRBS and 100D.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BRBS | 100D.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.26% | -34.63% | -53.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.87% | -10.78% | -5.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -88.26% | -13.06% | -75.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -88.26% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -75.07% | -4.65% | -70.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -50.57% | -4.71% | -45.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.20% | 2.40% | +3.80% |
Volatility
BRBS vs. 100D.L - Volatility Comparison
Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc. (BRBS) has a higher volatility of 7.09% compared to Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (100D.L) at 5.76%. This indicates that BRBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 100D.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BRBS | 100D.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.09% | 5.76% | +1.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.06% | 9.90% | +8.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.21% | 16.62% | +13.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.37% | 16.57% | +29.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.71% | 19.37% | +22.34% |