BHF vs. KMI
BHF (Brighthouse Financial, Inc.) and KMI (Kinder Morgan, Inc.) are both stocks. BHF operates in Insurance - Life (Financial Services), while KMI operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy). Over the past 5 years, BHF returned 5.10%/yr vs 17.09%/yr for KMI. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BHF vs. KMI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BHF achieves a -3.69% return, which is significantly lower than KMI's 16.28% return.
BHF
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -0.46%
- YTD
- -3.69%
- 6M
- -4.86%
- 1Y
- 5.55%
- 3Y*
- 12.72%
- 5Y*
- 5.10%
- 10Y*
- —
KMI
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -3.39%
- YTD
- 16.28%
- 6M
- 17.65%
- 1Y
- 14.39%
- 3Y*
- 29.68%
- 5Y*
- 17.09%
- 10Y*
- 11.21%
BHF vs. KMI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BHF Brighthouse Financial, Inc. | -3.69% | 34.87% | -9.22% | 3.22% | -1.02% | 43.07% | -7.71% | 28.71% | -48.02% | -16.23% |
KMI Kinder Morgan, Inc. | 16.28% | 4.74% | 64.42% | 4.10% | 21.23% | 23.75% | -30.77% | 44.43% | -11.18% | -6.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between BHF and KMI is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2017 | 0.43 |
Over the past year, the correlation between BHF and KMI has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.43, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
BHF:
-$1.50
KMI:
$1.53
BHF:
0.48
KMI:
3.98
BHF:
$5.58B
KMI:
$17.52B
BHF:
$2.23B
KMI:
$5.86B
BHF:
$942.00M
KMI:
$6.90B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BHF vs. KMI — Risk / Return Rank
BHF
KMI
BHF vs. KMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brighthouse Financial, Inc. (BHF) and Kinder Morgan, Inc. (KMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BHF | KMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.14 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.21 | 1.30 | -1.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.47 | 2.64 | -2.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BHF | KMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 | 0.71 | -0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 | 0.76 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.03 | 0.17 | -0.20 |
Drawdowns
BHF vs. KMI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BHF drawdown since its inception was -76.93%, which is greater than KMI's maximum drawdown of -72.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BHF and KMI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BHF | KMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.93% | -72.70% | -4.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.89% | -11.11% | -15.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.14% | -18.40% | -12.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.19% | -20.31% | -14.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -55.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.86% | -8.57% | -2.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.00% | -32.06% | -0.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.82% | 5.49% | +6.33% |
Volatility
BHF vs. KMI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Brighthouse Financial, Inc. (BHF) is 2.81%, while Kinder Morgan, Inc. (KMI) has a volatility of 7.15%. This indicates that BHF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BHF | KMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.81% | 7.15% | -4.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.01% | 15.03% | -8.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.01% | 20.33% | +33.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.41% | 22.58% | +20.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.83% | 27.74% | +21.09% |
Dividends
BHF vs. KMI - Dividend Comparison
BHF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BHF Brighthouse Financial, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KMI Kinder Morgan, Inc. | 3.75% | 4.24% | 4.18% | 6.38% | 6.10% | 6.76% | 7.59% | 4.49% | 4.71% | 2.77% | 2.41% | 12.94% |
Financials
BHF vs. KMI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brighthouse Financial, Inc. and Kinder Morgan, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BHF vs. KMI - Profitability Comparison
BHF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brighthouse Financial, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
KMI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinder Morgan, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.83B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
BHF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brighthouse Financial, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 1.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
KMI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinder Morgan, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.44B and revenue of 4.83B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.9%.
BHF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brighthouse Financial, Inc. reported a net income of -766.00M and revenue of 1.53B, resulting in a net margin of -50.2%.
KMI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinder Morgan, Inc. reported a net income of 1.06B and revenue of 4.83B, resulting in a net margin of 22.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BHF and KMI have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KMI has higher volatility (7.15%) compared to BHF (2.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BHF dropped -76.93% vs KMI's -72.70%.
KMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.71 vs 0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BHF and KMI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer