PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BHF vs. PRU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BHF vs. PRU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brighthouse Financial, Inc. (BHF) and Prudential Financial, Inc. (PRU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BHF achieves a -3.94% return, which is significantly higher than PRU's -6.51% return.


BHF

1D
-0.67%
1M
-0.65%
YTD
-3.94%
6M
-5.04%
1Y
5.26%
3Y*
12.62%
5Y*
5.08%
10Y*

PRU

1D
2.22%
1M
5.58%
YTD
-6.51%
6M
-2.15%
1Y
4.53%
3Y*
12.80%
5Y*
3.89%
10Y*
7.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BHF vs. PRU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BHF
Brighthouse Financial, Inc.
-3.94%34.87%-9.22%3.22%-1.02%43.07%-7.71%28.71%-48.02%-16.23%
PRU
Prudential Financial, Inc.
-6.51%0.18%19.46%10.09%-3.86%45.32%-11.40%20.10%-26.46%4.80%

Correlation

The correlation between BHF and PRU is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2017

0.76

Over the past year, the correlation between BHF and PRU has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.76, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

EPS

BHF:

-$1.50

PRU:

$9.85

PS Ratio

BHF:

0.48

PRU:

0.76

Total Revenue (TTM)

BHF:

$5.58B

PRU:

$47.43B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BHF:

$2.23B

PRU:

$14.72B

EBITDA (TTM)

BHF:

$942.00M

PRU:

$4.02B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BHF vs. PRU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BHF
BHF Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
BHF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BHF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
BHF Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
BHF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
BHF Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

PRU
PRU Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
PRU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRU Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
PRU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRU Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BHF vs. PRU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brighthouse Financial, Inc. (BHF) and Prudential Financial, Inc. (PRU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BHFPRUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.10

0.20

-0.11

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.81

0.41

+0.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.05

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.15

0.20

-0.05

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.34

0.44

-0.09

BHF vs. PRU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BHF Sharpe Ratio is 0.10, which is lower than the PRU Sharpe Ratio of 0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BHF and PRU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BHFPRUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

0.20

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

0.15

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.03

0.21

-0.23

Drawdowns

BHF vs. PRU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BHF drawdown since its inception was -76.93%, smaller than the maximum PRU drawdown of -88.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BHF and PRU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BHFPRUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.93%

-88.53%

+11.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.89%

-21.46%

-5.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.14%

-25.66%

-5.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.19%

-33.11%

-2.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-65.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.09%

-14.29%

+3.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.01%

-18.32%

-14.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.82%

9.75%

+2.07%

Volatility

BHF vs. PRU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brighthouse Financial, Inc. (BHF) is 2.80%, while Prudential Financial, Inc. (PRU) has a volatility of 5.56%. This indicates that BHF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BHFPRUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.80%

5.56%

-2.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.00%

17.29%

-10.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.02%

22.38%

+31.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.41%

25.79%

+17.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.84%

31.83%

+17.01%

Dividends

BHF vs. PRU - Dividend Comparison

BHF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PRU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.35%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BHF
Brighthouse Financial, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PRU
Prudential Financial, Inc.
5.35%4.78%4.39%4.82%4.83%4.25%5.64%4.27%4.41%2.61%2.69%3.00%

Financials

BHF vs. PRU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brighthouse Financial, Inc. and Prudential Financial, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
1.53B
0
(BHF) Total Revenue
(PRU) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


BHF and PRU have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRU has higher volatility (5.56%) compared to BHF (2.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BHF dropped -76.93% vs PRU's -88.53%.

PRU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.20 vs 0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BHF and PRU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer