BGVIX vs. FGIAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Brandes Global Equity Fund (BGVIX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX).
BGVIX is managed by Brandes. It was launched on Oct 5, 2008. FGIAX is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index NR. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007.
Performance
BGVIX vs. FGIAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BGVIX vs. FGIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGVIX Brandes Global Equity Fund | -2.73% | 33.72% | 12.53% | 21.71% | -5.97% | 21.20% | 1.97% | 17.38% | -10.39% | 16.23% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.53% | 17.73% | 10.70% | 8.51% | -6.23% | 14.51% | -2.76% | 29.32% | -7.91% | 19.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BGVIX achieves a -2.73% return, which is significantly lower than FGIAX's 9.53% return. Over the past 10 years, BGVIX has outperformed FGIAX with an annualized return of 10.88%, while FGIAX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.70% annualized return.
BGVIX
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- -8.64%
- YTD
- -2.73%
- 6M
- 4.09%
- 1Y
- 20.55%
- 3Y*
- 19.13%
- 5Y*
- 12.59%
- 10Y*
- 10.88%
FGIAX
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -3.78%
- YTD
- 9.53%
- 6M
- 10.02%
- 1Y
- 20.91%
- 3Y*
- 14.03%
- 5Y*
- 10.45%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BGVIX vs. FGIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BGVIX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FGIAX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BGVIX vs. FGIAX — Risk / Return Rank
BGVIX
FGIAX
BGVIX vs. FGIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brandes Global Equity Fund (BGVIX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BGVIX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.32 | 1.75 | -0.44 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.80 | 2.26 | -0.45 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.35 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.58 | 2.61 | -1.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.05 | 12.12 | -5.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BGVIX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.32 | 1.75 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | 0.80 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | 0.58 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.42 | +0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between BGVIX and FGIAX is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BGVIX vs. FGIAX - Dividend Comparison
BGVIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.75%, more than FGIAX's 9.12% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGVIX Brandes Global Equity Fund | 12.75% | 12.41% | 9.13% | 4.80% | 3.31% | 6.00% | 2.98% | 2.46% | 6.99% | 4.02% | 2.07% | 8.51% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.12% | 9.99% | 7.46% | 2.27% | 6.11% | 7.20% | 1.38% | 7.06% | 6.32% | 5.83% | 8.23% | 3.05% |
Drawdowns
BGVIX vs. FGIAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGVIX drawdown since its inception was -41.16%, smaller than the maximum FGIAX drawdown of -49.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGVIX and FGIAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BGVIX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.16% | -49.35% | +8.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.97% | -8.29% | -3.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.37% | -21.08% | -4.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.16% | -38.02% | -3.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.73% | -3.78% | -4.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.35% | -7.22% | +0.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.69% | 1.78% | +0.91% |
Volatility
BGVIX vs. FGIAX - Volatility Comparison
Brandes Global Equity Fund (BGVIX) has a higher volatility of 4.65% compared to Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) at 4.05%. This indicates that BGVIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BGVIX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.65% | 4.05% | +0.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.98% | 7.09% | +1.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.62% | 12.28% | +3.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.11% | 13.08% | +2.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.44% | 15.17% | +2.27% |