BGVIX vs. BSCMX
BGVIX (Brandes Global Equity Fund) and BSCMX (Brandes Small Cap Value Fund) are both mutual funds - BGVIX is a Global Equities fund managed by Brandes, while BSCMX is a Small Cap Value Equities fund managed by Brandes. Over the past 5 years, BGVIX returned 12.35%/yr vs 15.52%/yr for BSCMX. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BGVIX charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.91%/yr for BSCMX.
Performance
BGVIX vs. BSCMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BGVIX achieves a 4.26% return, which is significantly lower than BSCMX's 15.67% return.
BGVIX
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 1.78%
- YTD
- 4.26%
- 6M
- 6.81%
- 1Y
- 24.73%
- 3Y*
- 21.69%
- 5Y*
- 12.35%
- 10Y*
- 11.43%
BSCMX
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 1.80%
- YTD
- 15.67%
- 6M
- 17.50%
- 1Y
- 41.78%
- 3Y*
- 25.45%
- 5Y*
- 15.52%
- 10Y*
- —
BGVIX vs. BSCMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGVIX Brandes Global Equity Fund | 4.26% | 33.72% | 12.53% | 21.71% | -5.97% | 21.20% | 1.97% | 17.38% | -12.41% |
BSCMX Brandes Small Cap Value Fund | 15.67% | 23.51% | 24.77% | 22.75% | -7.89% | 27.61% | 20.38% | 12.82% | -12.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between BGVIX and BSCMX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 9, 2018 | 0.77 |
The correlation between BGVIX and BSCMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BGVIX vs. BSCMX — Risk / Return Rank
BGVIX
BSCMX
BGVIX vs. BSCMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brandes Global Equity Fund (BGVIX) and Brandes Small Cap Value Fund (BSCMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BGVIX | BSCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.43 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.78 | 4.59 | -1.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.86 | 15.58 | -5.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BGVIX | BSCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.12 | 2.55 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | 0.87 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.70 | -0.22 |
Drawdowns
BGVIX vs. BSCMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGVIX drawdown since its inception was -41.16%, which is greater than BSCMX's maximum drawdown of -38.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGVIX and BSCMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BGVIX | BSCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.16% | -38.12% | -3.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.03% | -9.65% | +0.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.22% | -22.34% | +8.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.37% | -22.34% | -3.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.18% | -1.28% | -0.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.32% | -6.04% | -0.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.54% | 2.83% | -0.29% |
Volatility
BGVIX vs. BSCMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Brandes Global Equity Fund (BGVIX) is 3.22%, while Brandes Small Cap Value Fund (BSCMX) has a volatility of 4.57%. This indicates that BGVIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BSCMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BGVIX | BSCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.22% | 4.57% | -1.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.87% | 11.66% | -2.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.89% | 17.35% | -5.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.15% | 17.89% | -2.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.43% | 20.60% | -3.17% |
BGVIX vs. BSCMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BGVIX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than BSCMX's 0.91% expense ratio.
Dividends
BGVIX vs. BSCMX - Dividend Comparison
BGVIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.90%, more than BSCMX's 3.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGVIX Brandes Global Equity Fund | 11.90% | 12.41% | 9.13% | 4.80% | 3.31% | 6.00% | 2.98% | 2.46% | 6.99% | 4.02% | 2.07% | 8.51% |
BSCMX Brandes Small Cap Value Fund | 3.93% | 4.54% | 2.31% | 3.50% | 2.93% | 4.38% | 1.76% | 1.11% | 9.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BGVIX and BSCMX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BSCMX has higher volatility (4.57%) compared to BGVIX (3.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGVIX dropped -41.16% vs BSCMX's -38.12%.
BSCMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BGVIX and BSCMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer