BGS vs. KMB
BGS (B&G Foods, Inc.) and KMB (Kimberly-Clark Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Defensive sector — BGS in Packaged Foods, KMB in Household & Personal Products. Over the past 10 years, BGS returned -14.86%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for KMB. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BGS vs. KMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BGS achieves a -2.65% return, which is significantly lower than KMB's 4.05% return. Over the past 10 years, BGS has underperformed KMB with an annualized return of -14.86%, while KMB has yielded a comparatively higher 0.95% annualized return.
BGS
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- -3.36%
- YTD
- -2.65%
- 6M
- -8.58%
- 1Y
- 9.87%
- 3Y*
- -25.46%
- 5Y*
- -27.79%
- 10Y*
- -14.86%
KMB
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 8.12%
- YTD
- 4.05%
- 6M
- 1.77%
- 1Y
- -17.99%
- 3Y*
- -4.95%
- 5Y*
- -0.92%
- 10Y*
- 0.95%
BGS vs. KMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGS B&G Foods, Inc. | -2.65% | -26.81% | -28.30% | 0.33% | -60.70% | 17.69% | 67.73% | -31.93% | -12.20% | -15.46% |
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 4.05% | -19.86% | 11.79% | -7.08% | -1.58% | 9.66% | 0.95% | 24.57% | -2.06% | 9.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between BGS and KMB is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2007 | 0.29 |
Fundamentals
BGS:
$323.22M
KMB:
$34.08B
BGS:
-$0.96
KMB:
$5.93
BGS:
0.18
KMB:
2.06
BGS:
0.80
KMB:
18.98
BGS:
$1.81B
KMB:
$16.54B
BGS:
$388.44M
KMB:
$5.93B
BGS:
$91.70M
KMB:
$3.07B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BGS vs. KMB — Risk / Return Rank
BGS
KMB
BGS vs. KMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for B&G Foods, Inc. (BGS) and Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BGS | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 0.87 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.16 | -0.67 | +0.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.47 | -1.03 | +1.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BGS vs. KMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGS drawdown since its inception was -86.50%, which is greater than KMB's maximum drawdown of -36.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGS and KMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BGS | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.50% | -36.97% | -49.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.11% | -29.60% | -3.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -67.36% | -34.06% | -33.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.68% | -34.06% | -50.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.50% | -34.06% | -52.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -83.99% | -26.52% | -57.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.06% | -8.85% | -23.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.32% | 19.43% | -8.11% |
Volatility
BGS vs. KMB - Volatility Comparison
B&G Foods, Inc. (BGS) has a higher volatility of 9.65% compared to Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) at 8.42%. This indicates that BGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BGS | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.65% | 8.42% | +1.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.85% | 16.67% | +17.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.42% | 25.77% | +25.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.32% | 20.19% | +29.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.31% | 21.07% | +25.24% |
Dividends
BGS vs. KMB - Dividend Comparison
BGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.86%, more than KMB's 4.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGS B&G Foods, Inc. | 18.86% | 17.67% | 11.03% | 7.24% | 14.48% | 6.18% | 6.85% | 10.60% | 6.54% | 5.29% | 3.94% | 3.94% |
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 4.97% | 5.00% | 3.72% | 3.88% | 3.42% | 3.19% | 3.17% | 3.00% | 3.51% | 3.22% | 3.22% | 2.77% |
Financials
BGS vs. KMB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between B&G Foods, Inc. and Kimberly-Clark Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BGS vs. KMB - Profitability Comparison
BGS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, B&G Foods, Inc. reported a gross profit of 79.89M and revenue of 408.94M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.5%.
KMB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.53B and revenue of 4.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.
BGS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, B&G Foods, Inc. reported an operating income of -10.96M and revenue of 408.94M, resulting in an operating margin of -2.7%.
KMB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported an operating income of 753.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.1%.
BGS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, B&G Foods, Inc. reported a net income of -32.54M and revenue of 408.94M, resulting in a net margin of -8.0%.
KMB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a net income of 521.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BGS and KMB have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BGS has higher volatility (9.65%) compared to KMB (8.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGS dropped -86.50% vs KMB's -36.97%.
BGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.10 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BGS and KMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer