BG vs. INSW

Last updated Jul 11, 2026

BG (Bunge Limited) and INSW (International Seaways, Inc.) are both stocks. BG operates in Farm Products (Consumer Defensive), while INSW operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy). Over the past 5 years, BG returned 11.18%/yr vs 51.47%/yr for INSW. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

BG vs. INSW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bunge Limited (BG) and International Seaways, Inc. (INSW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BG achieves a 29.85% return, which is significantly lower than INSW's 98.85% return.

BG

• 1D: 0.62%
• 1M: -8.75%
• 6M: 15.68%
• YTD: 29.85%
• 1Y: 53.17%
• 3Y*: 6.89%
• 5Y*: 11.18%
• 10Y*: 9.82%

INSW

• 1D: 6.63%
• 1M: 13.42%
• 6M: 77.43%
• YTD: 98.85%
• 1Y: 149.26%
• 3Y*: 48.58%
• 5Y*: 51.47%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BG vs. INSW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BG Bunge Limited	29.85%	18.56%	-20.74%	3.79%	9.28%	46.77%	18.92%	11.77%	-17.99%	-4.76%
INSW International Seaways, Inc.	98.85%	44.97%	-10.85%	42.93%	162.53%	-2.93%	-44.43%	76.72%	-8.78%	31.48%

Correlation

The correlation between BG and INSW is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.15
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.18
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2016	0.24

Fundamentals

Market Cap BG : $22.18B INSW : $4.38B
EPS BG : $3.89 INSW : $11.00
PE Ratio BG : 29.40 INSW : 8.05
PS Ratio BG : 0.25 INSW : 6.50
PB Ratio BG : 1.29 INSW : 2.00
Total Revenue (TTM) BG : $80.55B INSW : $675.87M
Gross Profit (TTM) BG : $3.58B INSW : $274.33M
EBITDA (TTM) BG : $2.19B INSW : $525.75M

Return for Risk

BG vs. INSW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BG

BG Risk / Return Rank: 87
BG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
BG Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
BG Omega Ratio Rank: 84
BG Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
BG Martin Ratio Rank: 89

INSW

INSW Risk / Return Rank: 98
INSW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
INSW Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
INSW Omega Ratio Rank: 96
INSW Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
INSW Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BG vs. INSW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bunge Limited (BG) and International Seaways, Inc. (INSW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BG	INSW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.74	3.99	-2.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.71	4.53	-1.82
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.54	-0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.67	9.38	-6.71
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.27	25.88	-16.61

BG vs. INSW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BG Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is lower than the INSW Sharpe Ratio of 3.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BG and INSW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BG vs. INSW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BG drawdown since its inception was -77.34%, which is greater than INSW's maximum drawdown of -57.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BG and INSW.

Drawdown Indicators

	BG	INSW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.34%	-57.49%	-19.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.18%	-16.16%	-4.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-38.82%	-50.40%	+11.58%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.49%	-50.40%	+8.91%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-60.49%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.01%	-1.67%	-11.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.83%	-20.78%	-8.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.80%	5.85%	-0.05%

Volatility

BG vs. INSW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bunge Limited (BG) is 9.66%, while International Seaways, Inc. (INSW) has a volatility of 16.78%. This indicates that BG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INSW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BG	INSW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.66%	16.78%	-7.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.94%	29.47%	-8.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.89%	38.18%	-7.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.36%	41.38%	-12.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.04%	45.41%	-14.37%

Dividends

BG vs. INSW - Dividend Comparison

BG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.47%, less than INSW's 9.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BG Bunge Limited	2.47%	3.12%	3.48%	2.55%	2.31%	2.76%	3.05%	3.48%	3.59%	2.62%	2.21%	2.11%
INSW International Seaways, Inc.	9.41%	6.04%	16.05%	13.83%	3.84%	9.26%	1.47%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BG and INSW in my portfolio?

BG and INSW have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BG or INSW?

INSW has higher volatility (16.78%) compared to BG (9.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BG dropped -77.34% vs INSW's -57.49%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

INSW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.99 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.