PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BG vs. INSW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BG vs. INSW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bunge Limited (BG) and International Seaways, Inc. (INSW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BG achieves a 20.66% return, which is significantly lower than INSW's 116.16% return.


BG

1D
1.10%
1M
1.28%
6M
-5.62%
YTD
20.66%
1Y
36.94%
3Y*
2.24%
5Y*
9.51%
10Y*
8.51%
ALL TIME*
10.10%

INSW

1D
1.02%
1M
23.66%
6M
75.93%
YTD
116.16%
1Y
171.90%
3Y*
47.43%
5Y*
56.61%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
29.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$168.20M$156.93M$196.43M
$46.42M$43.17M$49.32M

BG vs. INSW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BG
Bunge Limited
20.66%18.56%-20.74%3.79%9.28%46.77%18.92%11.77%-17.99%-4.76%
INSW
International Seaways, Inc.
116.16%44.97%-10.85%42.93%162.53%-2.93%-44.43%76.72%-8.78%31.48%

Correlation

The correlation between BG and INSW is 0.12, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2016

0.24

The correlation between BG and INSW shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.24 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BG:

$20.41B

INSW:

$4.76B

EPS

BG:

$5.15

INSW:

$11.00

PE Ratio

BG:

20.65

INSW:

8.75

PS Ratio

BG:

0.23

INSW:

7.06

PB Ratio

BG:

1.31

INSW:

2.18

Total Revenue (TTM)

BG:

$91.82B

INSW:

$675.87M

Gross Profit (TTM)

BG:

$4.54B

INSW:

$274.33M

EBITDA (TTM)

BG:

$2.51B

INSW:

$525.75M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BG vs. INSW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BG
BG Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
BG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
BG Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
BG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
BG Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

INSW
INSW Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
INSW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INSW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
INSW Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
INSW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
INSW Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BG vs. INSW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bunge Limited (BG) and International Seaways, Inc. (INSW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BGINSWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.59

-0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.84

10.70

-8.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.72

29.60

-23.88

BG vs. INSW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BG Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is lower than the INSW Sharpe Ratio of 4.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BG and INSW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BG vs. INSW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BG drawdown since its inception was -77.34%, which is greater than INSW's maximum drawdown of -57.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BG and INSW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BGINSWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.34%

-57.49%

-19.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.18%

-16.16%

-4.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.82%

-50.40%

+11.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.49%

-50.40%

+8.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.16%

0.00%

-19.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.79%

-20.66%

-8.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.47%

5.83%

+0.64%

Volatility

BG vs. INSW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bunge Limited (BG) is 12.25%, while International Seaways, Inc. (INSW) has a volatility of 13.15%. This indicates that BG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INSW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BGINSWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.25%

13.15%

-0.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.14%

29.53%

-7.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.79%

38.05%

-6.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.58%

40.83%

-11.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.10%

45.33%

-14.23%

Dividends

BG vs. INSW - Dividend Comparison

BG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, less than INSW's 8.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BG
Bunge Limited
2.65%3.12%3.48%2.55%2.31%2.76%3.05%3.48%3.59%2.62%2.21%2.11%
INSW
International Seaways, Inc.
8.66%6.04%16.05%13.83%3.84%9.26%1.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

BG vs. INSW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bunge Limited and International Seaways, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


BG and INSW have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

INSW has higher volatility (13.15%) compared to BG (12.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BG dropped -77.34% vs INSW's -57.49%.

INSW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.56 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BG and INSW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer