PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BG vs. ADM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BG vs. ADM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bunge Limited (BG) and Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BG achieves a 26.55% return, which is significantly lower than ADM's 34.58% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BG having a 9.85% annualized return and ADM not far behind at 9.73%.


BG

1D
-1.03%
1M
-7.70%
YTD
26.55%
6M
25.55%
1Y
34.17%
3Y*
8.92%
5Y*
9.90%
10Y*
9.85%

ADM

1D
1.58%
1M
-1.59%
YTD
34.58%
6M
33.75%
1Y
46.79%
3Y*
4.94%
5Y*
7.47%
10Y*
9.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BG vs. ADM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BG
Bunge Limited
26.55%18.56%-20.74%3.79%9.28%46.77%18.92%11.77%-17.99%-4.76%
ADM
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company
34.58%18.24%-27.52%-20.42%39.98%37.33%12.44%17.10%5.28%-9.48%

Correlation

The correlation between BG and ADM is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2001

0.53

Over the past year, BG and ADM have become more correlated (0.76) than their long-term average of 0.53, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BG:

$21.84B

ADM:

$36.92B

EPS

BG:

$4.12

ADM:

$2.23

PE Ratio

BG:

27.04

ADM:

34.16

PS Ratio

BG:

0.23

ADM:

0.46

PB Ratio

BG:

1.25

ADM:

1.62

Total Revenue (TTM)

BG:

$80.55B

ADM:

$80.61B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BG:

$3.58B

ADM:

$4.70B

EBITDA (TTM)

BG:

$2.19B

ADM:

$3.48B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BG vs. ADM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BG
BG Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
BG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
BG Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
BG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
BG Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

ADM
ADM Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
ADM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADM Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
ADM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADM Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BG vs. ADM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bunge Limited (BG) and Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BGADMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.29

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.26

3.68

-1.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.49

9.85

-3.35

BG vs. ADM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BG Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is lower than the ADM Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BG and ADM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BG vs. ADM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BG drawdown since its inception was -77.34%, which is greater than ADM's maximum drawdown of -68.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BG and ADM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BGADMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.34%

-68.01%

-9.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.21%

-12.79%

-2.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.82%

-49.22%

+10.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.49%

-54.14%

+12.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.49%

-54.14%

-6.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.21%

-12.75%

-2.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.86%

-21.59%

-7.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.55%

4.77%

+0.78%

Volatility

BG vs. ADM - Volatility Comparison

Bunge Limited (BG) has a higher volatility of 9.82% compared to Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) at 7.89%. This indicates that BG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ADM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BGADMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.82%

7.89%

+1.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.53%

19.38%

+1.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.05%

26.90%

+4.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.29%

28.25%

+1.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.06%

26.99%

+4.07%

Dividends

BG vs. ADM - Dividend Comparison

BG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, less than ADM's 2.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ADM
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company
2.70%3.55%3.96%2.49%1.72%2.19%2.86%3.02%3.27%3.19%2.63%3.05%
BG
Bunge Limited
2.53%3.12%3.48%2.55%2.31%2.76%3.05%3.48%3.59%2.62%2.21%2.11%

Financials

BG vs. ADM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bunge Limited and Archer-Daniels-Midland Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B20222023202420252026
21.86B
20.49B
(BG) Total Revenue
(ADM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BG vs. ADM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Bunge Limited and Archer-Daniels-Midland Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

4.0%5.0%6.0%7.0%8.0%9.0%20222023202420252026
3.5%
6.0%
Portfolio components
BG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bunge Limited reported a gross profit of 766.00M and revenue of 21.86B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 3.5%.

ADM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Archer-Daniels-Midland Company reported a gross profit of 1.22B and revenue of 20.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 6.0%.

BG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bunge Limited reported an operating income of 235.00M and revenue of 21.86B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.1%.

ADM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Archer-Daniels-Midland Company reported an operating income of 408.00M and revenue of 20.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.0%.

BG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bunge Limited reported a net income of 68.00M and revenue of 21.86B, resulting in a net margin of 0.3%.

ADM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Archer-Daniels-Midland Company reported a net income of 298.00M and revenue of 20.49B, resulting in a net margin of 1.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BG and ADM have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BG has higher volatility (9.82%) compared to ADM (7.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BG dropped -77.34% vs ADM's -68.01%.

ADM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BG and ADM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer