PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BG vs. AGCO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BG vs. AGCO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bunge Limited (BG) and AGCO Corporation (AGCO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BG achieves a 25.92% return, which is significantly higher than AGCO's 7.11% return. Over the past 10 years, BG has underperformed AGCO with an annualized return of 9.80%, while AGCO has yielded a comparatively higher 11.10% annualized return.


BG

1D
-0.50%
1M
-8.16%
YTD
25.92%
6M
26.67%
1Y
35.45%
3Y*
8.74%
5Y*
9.71%
10Y*
9.80%

AGCO

1D
-2.37%
1M
-1.44%
YTD
7.11%
6M
5.81%
1Y
11.72%
3Y*
-3.26%
5Y*
0.26%
10Y*
11.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BG vs. AGCO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BG
Bunge Limited
25.92%18.56%-20.74%3.79%9.28%46.77%18.92%11.77%-17.99%-4.76%
AGCO
AGCO Corporation
7.11%12.85%-20.33%-7.90%24.99%16.16%34.77%40.02%-21.30%24.50%

Correlation

The correlation between BG and AGCO is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2001

0.38

The correlation between BG and AGCO shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (1 year) to 0.40 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BG:

$21.73B

AGCO:

$8.09B

EPS

BG:

$4.12

AGCO:

$10.42

PE Ratio

BG:

26.90

AGCO:

10.67

PS Ratio

BG:

0.23

AGCO:

0.79

PB Ratio

BG:

1.25

AGCO:

1.88

Total Revenue (TTM)

BG:

$80.55B

AGCO:

$10.37B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BG:

$3.58B

AGCO:

$2.58B

EBITDA (TTM)

BG:

$2.19B

AGCO:

$984.20M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BG vs. AGCO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BG
BG Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
BG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
BG Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
BG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
BG Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

AGCO
AGCO Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
AGCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGCO Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
AGCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGCO Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BG vs. AGCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bunge Limited (BG) and AGCO Corporation (AGCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BGAGCODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.09

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.28

0.53

+1.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.76

1.05

+5.71

BG vs. AGCO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BG Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is higher than the AGCO Sharpe Ratio of 0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BG and AGCO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BG vs. AGCO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BG drawdown since its inception was -77.34%, smaller than the maximum AGCO drawdown of -83.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BG and AGCO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BGAGCODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.34%

-83.96%

+6.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.64%

-22.42%

+6.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.82%

-43.50%

+4.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.49%

-43.50%

+2.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.49%

-54.07%

-6.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.64%

-20.63%

+4.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.86%

-29.72%

+0.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.37%

11.14%

-5.77%

Volatility

BG vs. AGCO - Volatility Comparison

Bunge Limited (BG) has a higher volatility of 9.79% compared to AGCO Corporation (AGCO) at 9.26%. This indicates that BG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BGAGCODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.79%

9.26%

+0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.49%

24.34%

-3.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.99%

33.78%

-2.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.29%

35.11%

-5.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.02%

35.01%

-3.99%

Dividends

BG vs. AGCO - Dividend Comparison

BG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, more than AGCO's 1.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGCO
AGCO Corporation
1.05%1.11%3.92%5.03%3.91%4.10%0.62%0.82%1.08%0.78%0.90%1.06%
BG
Bunge Limited
2.54%3.12%3.48%2.55%2.31%2.76%3.05%3.48%3.59%2.62%2.21%2.11%

Financials

BG vs. AGCO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bunge Limited and AGCO Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


5.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
21.86B
2.34B
(BG) Total Revenue
(AGCO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BG vs. AGCO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Bunge Limited and AGCO Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%20222023202420252026
3.5%
24.8%
Portfolio components
BG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bunge Limited reported a gross profit of 766.00M and revenue of 21.86B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 3.5%.

AGCO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AGCO Corporation reported a gross profit of 581.40M and revenue of 2.34B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.8%.

BG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bunge Limited reported an operating income of 235.00M and revenue of 21.86B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.1%.

AGCO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AGCO Corporation reported an operating income of 80.70M and revenue of 2.34B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.4%.

BG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bunge Limited reported a net income of 68.00M and revenue of 21.86B, resulting in a net margin of 0.3%.

AGCO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AGCO Corporation reported a net income of 55.00M and revenue of 2.34B, resulting in a net margin of 2.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BG and AGCO have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BG has higher volatility (9.79%) compared to AGCO (9.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BG dropped -77.34% vs AGCO's -83.96%.

BG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.15 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BG and AGCO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer