BG vs. AGCO
BG (Bunge Limited) and AGCO (AGCO Corporation) are both stocks. BG operates in Farm Products (Consumer Defensive), while AGCO operates in Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, BG returned 7.95%/yr vs 10.33%/yr for AGCO. Their 0.38 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
BG vs. AGCO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BG achieves a 19.72% return, which is significantly higher than AGCO's 0.08% return. Over the past 10 years, BG has underperformed AGCO with an annualized return of 7.95%, while AGCO has yielded a comparatively higher 10.33% annualized return.
BG
- 1D
- -0.78%
- 1M
- -1.00%
- 6M
- -6.44%
- YTD
- 19.72%
- 1Y
- 38.93%
- 3Y*
- 0.07%
- 5Y*
- 10.02%
- 10Y*
- 7.95%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.06%
AGCO
- 1D
- 1.72%
- 1M
- -10.79%
- 6M
- -8.95%
- YTD
- 0.08%
- 1Y
- -7.61%
- 3Y*
- -5.30%
- 5Y*
- -1.77%
- 10Y*
- 10.33%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.34%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
AGCO AGCO Corporation | $118.64M | $97.27M | $85.98M |
| $165.42M | $153.85M | $193.55M |
BG vs. AGCO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BG Bunge Limited | 19.72% | 18.56% | -20.74% | 3.79% | 9.28% | 46.77% | 18.92% | 11.77% | -17.99% | -4.76% |
AGCO AGCO Corporation | 0.08% | 12.85% | -20.33% | -7.90% | 24.99% | 16.16% | 34.77% | 40.02% | -21.30% | 24.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between BG and AGCO is 0.21, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.38 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2001 | 0.38 |
The correlation between BG and AGCO shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.39 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BG:
$20.25B
AGCO:
$7.28B
BG:
$5.15
AGCO:
$7.29
BG:
20.49
AGCO:
14.25
BG:
0.23
AGCO:
0.73
BG:
1.29
AGCO:
1.81
BG:
$91.82B
AGCO:
$10.35B
BG:
$4.54B
AGCO:
$2.59B
BG:
$2.51B
AGCO:
$986.90M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BG vs. AGCO — Risk / Return Rank
BG
AGCO
BG vs. AGCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bunge Limited (BG) and AGCO Corporation (AGCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BG | AGCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 0.99 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.94 | -0.28 | +2.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.92 | -0.61 | +6.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BG vs. AGCO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BG drawdown since its inception was -77.34%, smaller than the maximum AGCO drawdown of -83.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BG and AGCO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BG | AGCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.34% | -83.96% | +6.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.18% | -27.10% | +6.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.82% | -40.55% | +1.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.49% | -43.50% | +2.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -60.49% | -54.07% | -6.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.79% | -25.84% | +6.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.79% | -29.68% | +0.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.59% | 12.40% | -5.81% |
Volatility
BG vs. AGCO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Bunge Limited (BG) is 12.19%, while AGCO Corporation (AGCO) has a volatility of 14.27%. This indicates that BG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BG | AGCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.19% | 14.27% | -2.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.13% | 27.52% | -5.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.77% | 33.88% | -2.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.59% | 35.40% | -5.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.11% | 35.20% | -4.09% |
Dividends
BG vs. AGCO - Dividend Comparison
BG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, more than AGCO's 1.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGCO AGCO Corporation | 1.13% | 1.11% | 3.92% | 5.03% | 3.91% | 4.10% | 0.62% | 0.82% | 1.08% | 0.78% | 0.90% | 1.06% |
BG Bunge Limited | 2.68% | 3.12% | 3.48% | 2.55% | 2.31% | 2.76% | 3.05% | 3.48% | 3.59% | 2.62% | 2.21% | 2.11% |
Financials
BG vs. AGCO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bunge Limited and AGCO Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BG vs. AGCO - Profitability Comparison
BG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Bunge Limited reported a gross profit of 1.68B and revenue of 24.04B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 7.0%.
AGCO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, AGCO Corporation reported a gross profit of 645.90M and revenue of 2.61B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.8%.
BG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Bunge Limited reported an operating income of 1.08B and revenue of 24.04B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.5%.
AGCO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, AGCO Corporation reported an operating income of 140.70M and revenue of 2.61B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.4%.
BG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Bunge Limited reported a net income of 678.00M and revenue of 24.04B, resulting in a net margin of 2.8%.
AGCO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, AGCO Corporation reported a net income of 77.20M and revenue of 2.61B, resulting in a net margin of 3.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BG and AGCO have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AGCO has higher volatility (14.27%) compared to BG (12.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BG dropped -77.34% vs AGCO's -83.96%.
BG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BG and AGCO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer