BFJA vs. CIBR

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

BFJA (FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - January) and CIBR (First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BFJA is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by First Trust, while CIBR is a Cybersecurity fund tracking the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. BFJA is actively managed, while CIBR is passively managed. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BFJA charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for CIBR.

Performance

BFJA vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - January (BFJA) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BFJA

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: -1.52%
• 6M: -15.18%
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CIBR

• 1D: -1.73%
• 1M: 8.00%
• 6M: 28.88%
• YTD: 30.63%
• 1Y: 28.00%
• 3Y*: 27.38%
• 5Y*: 15.09%
• 10Y*: 18.55%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BFJA vs. CIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BFJA FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - January	-13.10%
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF	28.64%

Correlation

The correlation between BFJA and CIBR is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2026	0.25

Return for Risk

BFJA vs. CIBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BFJA

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CIBR

CIBR Risk / Return Rank: 34
CIBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
CIBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
CIBR Omega Ratio Rank: 36
CIBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
CIBR Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BFJA vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - January (BFJA) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BFJA	CIBR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.09	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.62	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.20	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.28	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	2.96	—

Drawdowns

BFJA vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BFJA drawdown since its inception was -16.74%, smaller than the maximum CIBR drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFJA and CIBR.

Drawdown Indicators

	BFJA	CIBR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.74%	-33.89%	+17.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-21.99%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-21.99%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.89%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.18%	-1.73%	-13.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.02%	-8.64%	-1.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	9.47%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BFJA	CIBR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	7.82%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	22.45%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.46%	25.73%	-11.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.46%	25.25%	-10.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.46%	23.62%	-9.16%

BFJA vs. CIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

BFJA has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than CIBR's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

BFJA vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison

BFJA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CIBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BFJA FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - January	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF	0.42%	0.42%	0.29%	0.42%	0.31%	0.59%	1.10%	0.23%	0.23%	0.10%	0.77%	0.58%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BFJA and CIBR in my portfolio?

BFJA and CIBR have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BFJA or CIBR?

On fees, CIBR is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BFJA or CIBR?

CIBR is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BFJA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BFJA or CIBR?

CIBR has the higher dividend yield at 0.42%, compared with 0.00% for BFJA.

What is the main difference between BFJA and CIBR?

BFJA is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while CIBR is Cybersecurity. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for BFJA and 0.60% for CIBR.