BFJA vs. CIBR

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

BFJA (FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - January) and CIBR (First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BFJA is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by First Trust, while CIBR is a Cybersecurity fund tracking the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. BFJA is actively managed, while CIBR is passively managed. Their 0.23 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BFJA charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for CIBR.

Performance

BFJA vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - January (BFJA) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BFJA

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: -0.09%
• 6M: -8.36%
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

CIBR

• 1D: 4.29%
• 1M: 8.02%
• 6M: 46.36%
• YTD: 37.43%
• 1Y: 35.14%
• 3Y*: 30.10%
• 5Y*: 15.15%
• 10Y*: 18.86%
• ALL TIME*: 16.06%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BFJA FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - January	$278.70	$434.88	$1.70K
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF	$122.77M	$138.03M	$141.88M

BFJA vs. CIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BFJA FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - January	-13.87%
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF	35.35%

Correlation

The correlation between BFJA and CIBR is 0.23, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2026	0.23

Return for Risk

BFJA vs. CIBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BFJA

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CIBR

CIBR Risk / Return Rank: 43
CIBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
CIBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
CIBR Omega Ratio Rank: 45
CIBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
CIBR Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BFJA vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - January (BFJA) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BFJA	CIBR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.34	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.94	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.24	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.61	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	3.71	—

Drawdowns

BFJA vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BFJA drawdown since its inception was -16.74%, smaller than the maximum CIBR drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFJA and CIBR.

Drawdown Indicators

	BFJA	CIBR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.74%	-33.89%	+17.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-21.99%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-21.99%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.89%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.93%	0.00%	-15.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.57%	-8.62%	-1.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	9.49%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BFJA	CIBR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	8.33%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	22.75%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.86%	26.31%	-12.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.86%	25.38%	-11.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.86%	23.69%	-9.83%

BFJA vs. CIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

BFJA has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than CIBR's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

BFJA vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison

BFJA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CIBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BFJA FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - January	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF	0.40%	0.42%	0.29%	0.42%	0.31%	0.59%	1.10%	0.23%	0.23%	0.10%	0.77%	0.58%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BFJA and CIBR in my portfolio?

BFJA and CIBR have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BFJA or CIBR?

On fees, CIBR is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BFJA or CIBR?

CIBR is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BFJA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BFJA or CIBR?

CIBR has the higher dividend yield at 0.40%, compared with 0.00% for BFJA.

What is the main difference between BFJA and CIBR?

BFJA is categorized as Defined Outcome, while CIBR is Cybersecurity. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for BFJA and 0.60% for CIBR.