PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BFJA vs. GRID
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BFJA vs. GRID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - January (BFJA) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BFJA

1D
0.04%
1M
-1.52%
6M
-15.18%
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GRID

1D
-0.59%
1M
-4.72%
6M
17.33%
YTD
19.90%
1Y
32.66%
3Y*
20.81%
5Y*
16.16%
10Y*
18.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BFJA vs. GRID - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BFJA and GRID is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2026

0.45

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BFJA vs. GRID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BFJA

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


GRID
GRID Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
GRID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRID Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRID Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
GRID Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRID Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BFJA vs. GRID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - January (BFJA) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BFJAGRIDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.86

BFJA vs. GRID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BFJA vs. GRID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BFJA drawdown since its inception was -16.74%, smaller than the maximum GRID drawdown of -40.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFJA and GRID.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BFJAGRIDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.74%

-40.56%

+23.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.18%

-8.23%

-6.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.02%

-8.41%

-1.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.70%

Volatility

BFJA vs. GRID - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BFJAGRIDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.46%

22.00%

-7.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.46%

21.51%

-7.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.46%

22.70%

-8.24%

BFJA vs. GRID - Expense Ratio Comparison

BFJA has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than GRID's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

BFJA vs. GRID - Dividend Comparison

BFJA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GRID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BFJA
FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - January
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GRID
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund
0.78%1.01%1.06%1.23%1.26%0.63%0.68%1.26%1.28%1.07%1.07%1.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


BFJA and GRID have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GRID is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GRID is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BFJA.

GRID has the higher dividend yield at 0.78%, compared with 0.00% for BFJA.

BFJA is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while GRID is Alternative Energy Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for BFJA and 0.70% for GRID.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BFJA and GRID

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer