BETZ vs. XLYI
BETZ (Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF) and XLYI (State Street Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BETZ is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming Index, while XLYI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street. BETZ is passively managed, while XLYI is actively managed. Over the past year, BETZ returned -16.95% vs 8.70% for XLYI. Their 0.47 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BETZ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XLYI.
Performance
BETZ vs. XLYI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BETZ achieves a -8.87% return, which is significantly lower than XLYI's -0.31% return.
BETZ
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- 6M
- 2.90%
- YTD
- -8.87%
- 1Y
- -16.95%
- 3Y*
- 3.15%
- 5Y*
- -5.84%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.39%
XLYI
- 1D
- 2.83%
- 1M
- -0.39%
- 6M
- -2.34%
- YTD
- -0.31%
- 1Y
- 8.70%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.29%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $205.48K | $310.34K | $782.30K | |
| $81.44K | $62.05K | $59.61K |
BETZ vs. XLYI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BETZ Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF | -8.87% | -8.07% |
XLYI State Street Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | -0.31% | 5.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between BETZ and XLYI is 0.47, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025 | 0.47 |
BETZ vs. XLYI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BETZ
XLYI
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Communication Services
-
Industrials
-
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
BETZ
XLYI
Technology
BETZ
XLYI
Communication Services
BETZ
XLYI
-
Industrials
BETZ
XLYI
-
Financial Services
BETZ
XLYI
Basic Materials
BETZ
-
XLYI
-
Consumer Defensive
BETZ
-
XLYI
-
Energy
BETZ
-
XLYI
-
Healthcare
BETZ
-
XLYI
-
Real Estate
BETZ
-
XLYI
-
Utilities
BETZ
-
XLYI
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BETZ vs. XLYI — Risk / Return Rank
BETZ
XLYI
BETZ vs. XLYI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) and State Street Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLYI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BETZ | XLYI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.08 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.60 | 0.53 | -1.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.93 | 1.50 | -2.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BETZ vs. XLYI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BETZ drawdown since its inception was -60.82%, which is greater than XLYI's maximum drawdown of -12.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BETZ and XLYI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BETZ | XLYI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.82% | -12.32% | -48.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.20% | -12.32% | -16.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.20% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.79% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.35% | -3.86% | -34.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.89% | -3.29% | -30.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.92% | 4.33% | +14.59% |
Volatility
BETZ vs. XLYI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) is 5.96%, while State Street Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLYI) has a volatility of 6.42%. This indicates that BETZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLYI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BETZ | XLYI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.96% | 6.42% | -0.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.04% | 12.97% | +4.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.17% | 16.34% | +4.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.97% | 16.32% | +10.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.85% | 16.32% | +11.53% |
BETZ vs. XLYI - Expense Ratio Comparison
BETZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than XLYI's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
BETZ vs. XLYI - Dividend Comparison
BETZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.02%, less than XLYI's 14.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BETZ Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF | 5.02% | 4.57% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.28% |
XLYI State Street Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 14.79% | 6.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BETZ and XLYI have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLYI has higher volatility (6.42%) compared to BETZ (5.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BETZ dropped -60.82% vs XLYI's -12.32%.
On 1-year performance, XLYI leads with 8.70% vs -16.95% for BETZ. On fees, XLYI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, BETZ has been the lower-risk option at 5.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XLYI has performed better with a 8.70% return vs -16.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLYI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BETZ.
XLYI has the higher dividend yield at 14.79%, compared with 5.02% for BETZ.
BETZ is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while XLYI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BETZ and 0.35% for XLYI.
XLYI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.40 vs -0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BETZ and XLYI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer