BETZ vs. EATZ

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

BETZ (Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF) and EATZ (AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds. BETZ is passively managed, while EATZ is actively managed. Their 0.63 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BETZ charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for EATZ.

Performance

BETZ vs. EATZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) and AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BETZ

• 1D: -0.58%
• 1M: 0.36%
• 6M: 2.90%
• YTD: -8.87%
• 1Y: -16.95%
• 3Y*: 3.15%
• 5Y*: -5.84%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 4.39%

EATZ

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BETZ Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF	$205.48K	$310.34K	$782.30K

BETZ vs. EATZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BETZ Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF	-8.87%	15.75%	10.22%	21.17%	-42.02%	-18.35%
EATZ AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF	4.80%	-6.67%	23.21%	25.23%	-20.68%	-4.90%

Correlation

The correlation between BETZ and EATZ is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.44
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.53
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2021	0.63

The correlation between BETZ and EATZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.63 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BETZ vs. EATZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BETZ	EATZ
Consumer Cyclical	77.1%	78.2%
Technology	8.6%	-
Communication Services	3.9%	2.3%
Industrials	2.8%	4.9%
Financial Services	0.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	16.9%
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

BETZ vs. EATZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BETZ

BETZ Risk / Return Rank: 4
BETZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
BETZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
BETZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3
BETZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
BETZ Martin Ratio Rank: 5

EATZ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BETZ vs. EATZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) and AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BETZ	EATZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.83	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.09	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.88	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.60	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.93	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	BETZ	EATZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.82%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.20%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.20%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-59.79%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-38.35%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-33.89%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	18.92%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BETZ	EATZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.96%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.04%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.17%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.97%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.85%	—	—

BETZ vs. EATZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BETZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than EATZ's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

BETZ vs. EATZ - Dividend Comparison

BETZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.02%, more than EATZ's 0.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BETZ Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF	5.02%	4.57%	0.86%	0.00%	0.66%	0.00%	0.28%
EATZ AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF	0.48%	0.50%	0.18%	0.49%	2.35%	0.15%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BETZ and EATZ in my portfolio?

BETZ and EATZ have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BETZ or EATZ?

On fees, BETZ is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BETZ or EATZ?

BETZ is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for EATZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BETZ or EATZ?

BETZ has the higher dividend yield at 5.02%, compared with 0.48% for EATZ.

What is the main difference between BETZ and EATZ?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and AdvisorShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BETZ and 1.00% for EATZ.